RCU Forums - View Single Post - F3a The Future
Thread: F3a The Future
View Single Post
Old 03-18-2013 | 10:00 AM
  #126  
MTK
Senior Member
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 5,386
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
From: Whippany, NJ
Default RE: F3a The Future


ORIGINAL: bem

Edit....
First, the cost - a slight bonus factor forplanes that was built by the flyer himself, that would encourage own designs and balsa/ply based planes that can keep the cost down. The really good flyers even if they have ARF's should not have to much disadvantage of that.
You could also have some bonus for lighter planes so if You wanted to use a gas engine You should be allowed but the plane would probably be little heavier then. It's up to the flyer to choose what he prefer as powerplant but more weight should give no bounus effect. Although the contra rotating prop system is probably herer to stay - one can have a slight bonus for people that do not use contra system and that way encourage the less expensive solutions.

Second, how can the flying attract people to watch it - many say it is boring to watch F3A flying. In some way that should be something to take into consideration for the future. I do not know what can be done but in the long run if spectators do not think it is fun to watch F3A flying that should be a hint to make some changes.

/Bo
Agreed, less expensive should be better, easier for new pliots to enter.

Don't agree that gasoline power is heavier in all cases. Consider the fact that my Gassified Vanquish came in at less than 4700 grams; include the gas which is 6 ounces, weight RTF if about 4850. Electric versions are coming in at just about 5000 grams, flight ready.

The contra is agood tool for pattern. But maybe too costly for the average pilot.
HOWEVER, I am not convinced that it is necessary to win!! It will not make a baillarina out of a hippo

Agreed, Pattern Flying in general is boring to the casual on-looker. As judges we are stuck in the chair with a front row seat watching boredom unlimited...gag me with a spoon!! BUT I love it!
I doubt ANYTHING is more boring to watch than Golf, and I love watching and playing that stupid game. Bring in great TV coverage with terrific action shots and Golf popularity is surging and has been for 40 years or more. It doesn't hurt that at least halfabillion people worldwide play Golf

If we could even get some creative TV coverage, I'd bet Pattern (or IMAC) could be made exciting. Would love that too but ain't gonna happen; not in my lifetime...