Well JR just to see if anything is mentioned that is being done I have actually been reading MA and ya know what, there isnt a dang thing in there worth reading. The only thing MA seems to publish is positive propoganda. Take the last issue with the flight across the atlantic. with all the talk abt how AMA shouldnt be involved and the questions abt Dave's motives etc not 1 question was answered just a bunch of positive spin on the flight. Sure we all know it was a great feat but with all kinds of questions going around Dave could have at least clarified things. What about all the talk going on abt CD's at some events letting things get out of hand? if the safety committee ios looking into those things why arent they mentioned? MA is just a propoganda tool for the EC and you never see them discussing issues that may cause a rift between 2 factions. You look on the AMA site and any notes from any meetings are vague. Blah blah blah brought up whatever and then some motion made. what was said who said what what were the positives what were the negatives of the meetings. You stand up for the AMA in most cases and seem to be defending them here. My question is where is all this detailed information you are saying is being mentioned? all there are is vague references to info and no in depth information being given out. its more like communist propoganda and dictatorship than democratic. the EC does what they want and if they dont want info getting out they dont put it out. If they dont want to touch a problem they tell the membership to do all the work and bring them the facts knowing it would be most impossible to get enough details to make them happy. Information I havent seen any information yet just propoganda.

Joe