Geistware, obviously, you have not studied the problem there.

A neighbor wanted Hammer to sign away his rights to develop His -- Hammer's -- own personal private property, so the neighbor could run a Private aircraft runway right up to Hammer's property. That sign-away was to last even after Hammer sold the property or passed the property to heirs, effectively making the property near worthless.

Hammer said NO as any rational property owner should.

AMA was on the neighbor's side because their concern is only for some possible insurance conflict. They did NOT give a da-n about an AMA member and RC facility, just their in-house administrative things.

Hammer was 101% RIGHT and SF and AMA were 101% totally WRONG.[>:]

You need to study the facts if you place yourself on the jury. More grounds-to-prove.