I started this thread because a rather significant change had been made to the Safety Code. It never occurred to me that you would not know what is in the Safety Code and fish in and troll.

Now that we have that cleared up, lets discuss the problem.

I don't think your incorrect words are lies as that requires original thinking and the intent deceive. However, I have seen enough of your AMA damaging remarks to take exception and attempt to correct the misleading drivel you have spewed forth all over the internet. This is not to the best interests of the hobby, the AMA, or you.

You have made certain representations about the AMA insurance that appear to be in error. You cross posted them in many venues. There are threads all over the place discussing the ramifications of what you have claimed as fact. Your misrepresentation is even quoted in the Clubhouse on a No-Fault Liability thread. I have seen you make absolutely no effort to set the record straight, but, then, I do not know every place you posted.

Horrace, this goes well beyond the politics and the mutual dislike between us. I don't think you intended to do damage to the image of the AMA and to the image of the AMA’s insurance coverage. If you have some problem with what Carl Maroney says the coverage is, resolve it. I feel certain that you must have seen the letter that JR wrote to him and Carl’s answer. On the off chance you have not, here is the link to it: http://www.rcuniverse.com/forum/fb.a...066&tostyle=tm