Changes to AMA Safety Code
#26
Thread Starter

My Feedback: (3)
ORIGINAL: mongo
davy:
no one ever said that inteligence was a requirement for election to high office at the ama.
a solid reading of the safety code proves the general lack of inteligence on the part of the rule writers<G>.
davy:
no one ever said that inteligence was a requirement for election to high office at the ama.
a solid reading of the safety code proves the general lack of inteligence on the part of the rule writers<G>.
Be nice! Be thankful that they didn't allow lawyers to write the rules! Just think how confusing all those wherefore and parties of the first part would be.
Seriously, it is very clear that the EC makes their share of mistakes since they are human. However, they strive to correct errors in a manner that have positive impacts when they can find the way. An example is the change in the rule for R/C combat from limiting engine size to increasing the set back for larger engines. I happen to think that particular improvement sort of paves the way for modifying the new 'no tail touch' rule, which would make more people winners. We would be safer AND we could have our fun too and at the same time show off our skills (or is it stupidity to tail touch a $10,000 airplane????) for all to see.
#27
Senior Member
My Feedback: (5)
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 6,747
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: An Iceburg in, ANTARCTICA
ORIGINAL: dave jones
The AMA has finely done done it to us this time. Take a look at the new AMA rules that will take affect on 01-01-2004 on page 163 of MA.
Look under the general part in paragraph 7 in the bold type.
What I like is the part where it states that. The operators of radio control model aircraft shall control the aircraft from the ground and maintain unenhanced visual contact with the aircraft throughout the entire flight operation.
I know that this was put in to prevent guys from flying from a video screen. But if you take the unenhanced visual contact part literally and if you require eye glasses then you will not be aloud to fly models under the new rules.
Then there is the part about. No aircraft shall be equipped with devices that would allow for autonomous flight.
Now read rule #4 it states The maximum takeoff weight of a model with fuel is 55 pounds, except models flown under Experimental Aircraft rules, Document Number 549*.
Now read the rules for free flights (there are only 3 rules for free flight)
FREE FLIGHT
1) I will not launch my model aircraft unless at least 100 feet downwind of spectators and automobile parking.
2) I will not fly my model unless the launch area is clear of all persons except my mechanic and officials.
3) I will employ the use of an adequate device in flight to extinguish any fuses on the model after it has completed its function.
Now read read rule #5
5) I will not fly my model unless it is identified with my name and address or AMA number, on or in the model. Note: This does not apply to models while being flown indoors.
So if I comply with rules # 4 and 5 then I can build a 55 lb Free flight model and if I put my name and address or AMA number, on or in the model I can then fly it under the new AMA rules and I will be covered by there insurance.
Now this 55 lb model can go where ever the wind takes it and that is ok, and if it hits someone or something it is still covered by my AMA insurance.
But if I install a GPS in a 3 lb model and program it to orbit the model field then I will not be covered by the AMA insurance.
Can you please tell me where the HELL the logic is in that?
And how about this part
8) I will not consume alcoholic beverages prior to, nor during, participation in any model operations.
It says prior to, but it does not how long prior to, so it if you go by there rules it could be that if at any time in your life you have ever consume an alcoholic beverage prior to the operation of a model then you are in violation of the rule #8.
If you have ever consume an alcoholic even if it was 20 years ago then you can not operate a model under the described AMA rules.
Dave Jones
The AMA has finely done done it to us this time. Take a look at the new AMA rules that will take affect on 01-01-2004 on page 163 of MA.
Look under the general part in paragraph 7 in the bold type.
What I like is the part where it states that. The operators of radio control model aircraft shall control the aircraft from the ground and maintain unenhanced visual contact with the aircraft throughout the entire flight operation.
I know that this was put in to prevent guys from flying from a video screen. But if you take the unenhanced visual contact part literally and if you require eye glasses then you will not be aloud to fly models under the new rules.
Then there is the part about. No aircraft shall be equipped with devices that would allow for autonomous flight.
Now read rule #4 it states The maximum takeoff weight of a model with fuel is 55 pounds, except models flown under Experimental Aircraft rules, Document Number 549*.
Now read the rules for free flights (there are only 3 rules for free flight)
FREE FLIGHT
1) I will not launch my model aircraft unless at least 100 feet downwind of spectators and automobile parking.
2) I will not fly my model unless the launch area is clear of all persons except my mechanic and officials.
3) I will employ the use of an adequate device in flight to extinguish any fuses on the model after it has completed its function.
Now read read rule #5
5) I will not fly my model unless it is identified with my name and address or AMA number, on or in the model. Note: This does not apply to models while being flown indoors.
So if I comply with rules # 4 and 5 then I can build a 55 lb Free flight model and if I put my name and address or AMA number, on or in the model I can then fly it under the new AMA rules and I will be covered by there insurance.
Now this 55 lb model can go where ever the wind takes it and that is ok, and if it hits someone or something it is still covered by my AMA insurance.
But if I install a GPS in a 3 lb model and program it to orbit the model field then I will not be covered by the AMA insurance.
Can you please tell me where the HELL the logic is in that?
And how about this part
8) I will not consume alcoholic beverages prior to, nor during, participation in any model operations.
It says prior to, but it does not how long prior to, so it if you go by there rules it could be that if at any time in your life you have ever consume an alcoholic beverage prior to the operation of a model then you are in violation of the rule #8.
If you have ever consume an alcoholic even if it was 20 years ago then you can not operate a model under the described AMA rules.
Dave Jones
Good post Dave! I don't fly free-flight, so I never really payed any attention to their rules...or lack of rules. I can see it now, a 60 pound free flight turbine powered model

I can't wait for next years rules now that you have pointed this out.[X(]
#28
Senior Member
My Feedback: (6)
Where do you find 'Experimental Aircraft' rule/Document 549? BTW, if a person is boss of a group of dues paying members and is in the business of selling products to the members-is that any kind of conflict of interest? Guess not, kind of like THE V.P.'s connection with Halliburton.
#29
Senior Member
My Feedback: (5)
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 6,747
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: An Iceburg in, ANTARCTICA
ORIGINAL: wsmalley
Where do you find 'Experimental Aircraft' rule/Document 549? BTW, if a person is boss of a group of dues paying members and is in the business of selling products to the members-is that any kind of conflict of interest? Guess not, kind of like THE V.P.'s connection with Halliburton.
Where do you find 'Experimental Aircraft' rule/Document 549? BTW, if a person is boss of a group of dues paying members and is in the business of selling products to the members-is that any kind of conflict of interest? Guess not, kind of like THE V.P.'s connection with Halliburton.
#31
Senior Member
My Feedback: (5)
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 6,747
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: An Iceburg in, ANTARCTICA
ORIGINAL: zxcv11
I thnik he means VP of the U.S. P-51B.
I thnik he means VP of the U.S. P-51B.
#32
ORIGINAL: P-51B
I figured that may be the case, but wanted to give him the benefit of the doubt, since the V.P. of the U.S. no longer works for Halliburton, and doesn't sell Haliburton products.
ORIGINAL: zxcv11
I thnik he means VP of the U.S. P-51B.
I thnik he means VP of the U.S. P-51B.
#34
It's a vailed reference to several EC members that have hobby related businesses.
JR
JR
So does this lead one to the thought that some of these EC members may be making regs. based upon their own personal sales prefrences/agendas. [X(]
I'm really confused now. Once again, deeper into the murk we tread. [
] Please someone help clear this up for me.....JR ???
Brian
#35
Senior Member
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 4,444
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Corona, CA,
Brian
Personally, I can not see any problem with the EC members being in the model business. I suppose, however, you could make a point that Dave Brown wants to sell more tail wheels and that is the reason that he wants tail touching disallowed
JR
Personally, I can not see any problem with the EC members being in the model business. I suppose, however, you could make a point that Dave Brown wants to sell more tail wheels and that is the reason that he wants tail touching disallowed

JR
#37
Senior Member
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 234
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: someplace,
I don't often visit these forums, but after spending the last two unproductive hours scanning different subjects I now understand more fully why I don't visit.
Same old stuff, maybe different names. My question is with all the energy spent posting, when in the heck do you posters find the time to build or fly model aircraft. Unless of course you are of the current ARF crowd.
And in the long run all the B/S does not solve any problems, WHY? simply because it goes no further than this forum. And you get to revel in your own ego. Just like the old CB craze of a few years back. ten-fer.
jeez
Same old stuff, maybe different names. My question is with all the energy spent posting, when in the heck do you posters find the time to build or fly model aircraft. Unless of course you are of the current ARF crowd.
And in the long run all the B/S does not solve any problems, WHY? simply because it goes no further than this forum. And you get to revel in your own ego. Just like the old CB craze of a few years back. ten-fer.
jeez
#38
Senior Member
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 4,444
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Corona, CA,
stalspin
What's the matter? You aren't afraid the AMA membership is going to find out how to play the game and put you out to pasture, are you?
Kinda funny how you use Dave Brown's analogy about the internet. Shall I go on?
JR
What's the matter? You aren't afraid the AMA membership is going to find out how to play the game and put you out to pasture, are you?
Kinda funny how you use Dave Brown's analogy about the internet. Shall I go on?
JR
#39
ORIGINAL: stalspin
I don't often visit these forums, but after spending the last two unproductive hours scanning different subjects I now understand more fully why I don't visit.
Same old stuff, maybe different names. My question is with all the energy spent posting, when in the heck do you posters find the time to build or fly model aircraft. Unless of course you are of the current ARF crowd.
And in the long run all the B/S does not solve any problems, WHY? simply because it goes no further than this forum. And you get to revel in your own ego. Just like the old CB craze of a few years back. ten-fer.
jeez
I don't often visit these forums, but after spending the last two unproductive hours scanning different subjects I now understand more fully why I don't visit.
Same old stuff, maybe different names. My question is with all the energy spent posting, when in the heck do you posters find the time to build or fly model aircraft. Unless of course you are of the current ARF crowd.
And in the long run all the B/S does not solve any problems, WHY? simply because it goes no further than this forum. And you get to revel in your own ego. Just like the old CB craze of a few years back. ten-fer.
jeez
I fly.
I also have an interest in the ama.
Please explain to me stalspin, what exactly is wrong with conversing on-line about things??
I'm confused by your, um, input.
Ego??
Take the stick out of thine own eye before the splinter in mine please.Brian



