Originally Posted by
init4fun
Sport , I see it differently , I believe the greater majority of folks would have seen it as one man protecting his privacy at home from what amounts to illegal intrusion on his property . Try this , take a camera with a telephoto lens and take pictures of your neighbors naked in their own homes and then go post them up on the internet , and then see how fast the police bust down your door , and drag you away as a "sex offender" . The drone on his property was an illegal intrusion as it's specific intent was to spy on the actor while in his own home , and if you think there aren't laws against that sort of thing , try what I suggested above , you'll be schooled soon enough on sex predator law . Christ , IN PUBLIC , if you use your cell phone to take a picture that is looking up a woman's dress , your done , It's called "Upskirting" and at least where I live will earn you a spot on the "sex offender registry" , trust me on this as there was just last week a case that went all through the news of just that , complete with the "but it happened in public" defense .... The guy got 6 months in the slam and a "level two" designation on the sex offender registry ......
I agree, but the execs who write the contracts are mostly libs.