Thanks Art, yes I have read it, very interesting indeed,
I did not read it until after I had spent a few hours exploring the device and the software, it certainly endorsed my initial opinions of this device as a game changer.

My review won’t be as extensive as Paul,s, I don’t have the equipment, it will be more of a practical nature to show the readers the capability and benefits to jet ops. of these devices, which have really impressed me. I always prefer empirical data ( just as I obtained with patch antennae using a Weatronics receiver with one patch and one whip and comparing logged RSSI and LQI numbers on the Wea system) rather than off the cuff opinions and I will be making some measurements for the article.

I am not Jeti owner ( but would have changed if the Core was not about to arrive) but when my Core arrives I may be able to explore telemetry further.

The ONLY thing this servo lacks, so far as I can see, is the ability to adjust intermediate positions between neutral and end to obtain exact matching of hard ganged servos at all points, as is possible with Weatronics software, which after 1000 turbine flights in 10 different models, I still consider a brilliant system. Perhaps software might allow that in future.

What really surprised me was that, although I am normally well informed on the latest rc developments I had not heard of these servos until mentioned by Stephan Volker in RCJI and, as far as I recall, there has been no mention of them on the jet forums or any mention at jet meetings. We can now spread the word via RCJI and the editor has approved that. Win/win!

Hugely impressed.