RCU Forums - View Single Post - While AMA talks, FAA acts...
View Single Post
Old 01-01-2019 | 05:48 PM
  #14  
init4fun's Avatar
init4fun
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 4,405
Received 53 Likes on 47 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by speedracerntrixie
Again, information starting at step 2. Review the wording in section 336 again especially the title of 336 " exception for model aircraft". At best this action taken by the FAA that Franklin boasts about is simply putting conflicting information on the same page which has allowed Franklin to post only the section that supports his agenda.
Here's where we diverge ;

I am not happy in the least with what I read in the FAA's documents , but if you start reading at step one of the FAA's rules for #336 operation as the FAA intends , and read through the entire missive from beginning to end without parsing the specific subsections (to attempt to falsely interpret the inaccurate viewpoint that the FAA is presently OK with #336 operations above 400 feet) , then the logical reader simply must take at face value what has been published by the FAA themselves , that #336 has no authorization above 400 feet . Now I realize that you believe this is yet another "You VS Franklin" thing , but damn , it's right there in black & white with no ambiguity whatsoever , , , , just exactly whom do you , speedracer , think the FAA is addressing with the statement ; "Fly at or below 400 feet when in uncontrolled airspace (Class G)" ? (Hint , this sentence is lifted word for word from the FAA's #336 rules !!!!!)