Originally Posted by
patrnflyr
I know this is an old thread but wanted to revisit this again. I purchased a new G2 version KT 120 which is mounted in a BVM Cougar PNP and also fly a BVM Bobcat with a JetCat 100RX. Flying this weekend at the Houston Jet Rally, I noticed a REMARKABLE difference between these turbines. I used to fly pattern and can perform a decent Cuban Eight that has standard heights and radii. When flying the Kingtech, I noticed that I need to go back to full power on the downline before I even start the roll and it doesn’t come up to full throttle until I’m actually going straight up on second half of the maneuver. With the JetCat, I can actually go to full power at the bottom while starting the second half loop. That’s a very notable difference for you non aerobatic guys. I’m sorry for describing it this way but it’s where I could really standardize the difference in actual flying conditions instead of a stopwatch. I’m going to start looking at YouTube videos on how to adjust the parameter with the new GSU video screen. Like I said earlier, I’m at sea level this weekend and live in Lubbock, TX at 3300 ft if that makes any difference. Thanks for your advice.
Not to say that there isn't a throttle delay, but do you think that the draggy scale Cougar vs a streamlined Bobcat doing an aerobatic maneuver may contribute to your needing more power sooner? Ie, the bobcat is able to use its momentum more efficiently for the maneuver needing the full throttle later vs the cougar?
I was the last of the "classically" trained turbine pilots in my area, and every turbine since the JetCat SE's seem like god sent miracles!
The last couple of G2 king techs I owned were "spin my head" fast.