Originally Posted by
Propworn
How many years has it been and your still not over it???? my my
1. Please cite source rule that limits how long someone can hold opinions before the rule requires them to get "over it?"
2. Considering that their lack of transparency, inept managment, continued loss of money on the magazine, etc. etc. happened as recently yesterday, the answer is less than one.
Originally Posted by
Propworn
Didnt know there were rules when or where one could edit or add to a post.
There isn't. However...
When you make a one sentence comment, and someone quotes that entire comment in a response, that creates an impression in the reader. Namely you said one thing and someone responded to the entirety of what you said.
But when you go back, and retroactively add considerable content to your original comment -- the respondent's original reply now appears to have quoted only a portion of your statement. And that creates a different impression in the reader, namely the reply chose to only address one of your points. That is not true of course, because at the time of your orginal statement, there was only one thing to comment upon.
Again, no rule against it, but it does misrepresent what you said initially, Fortunately the fix is easy, go back and edit your original post to show what was ADDED AFTER other's commented.