ORIGINAL: Ehab
ORIGINAL: RPMTech1
I have a question for you all and the AMA rule writers. What is the difference between a crash at say 80mph and one at 250mph when it comes to risk management?
Reid
Tons of difference..... E=1/2mv^2. Lots more energy at 250 mph. I know you said !QUOT!risk management!QUOT!, but you can see the picture!!
Uh, I understood there was to be no math
My point is that I believe the damage is done at the lower speeds just as effectively. If you are going to hit the windshield of my truck, I'd prefer you do it at 300mph so that it will at least be worth watching. I have not seen a rule proposal based upon equipment limitations yet that was going to prevent an accident.
To borrow from Greg's quote at Hearne this last weekend, The prudent man rule is more effective at preventing accidents than any aerodynamic theory you wish to apply.
Just go fly responsibly and have fun.
Cheers!
Reid