ORIGINAL: RichLockyer
The judgement is only as good as his ability to collect.
He can't garnish wages or lein your property without further court action, and if he takes it to a collection agency, he won't get the full amount anyways.
Ignore him.
If he starts making phone calls, document (and record) the calls. If he violates any of the terms of the Fair Credit Collection act, you've got him on a countersuit.
I won a case in small claims court a number of years ago (not hobby related). I was encouraged to take this action by a policeman. I had no idea that the defendant was not obligated to pay, in spite of the judgment. The judge said to me, in front of the defendant, "Now it's up to you to collect." I have never been paid. It's been about seven years. Now for the other side of the story. This defendant can never apply for credit, so I understand, without stating that they have a judgment against them. To do so would violate the law and lead to more serious charges. My wife and I, as the winning plaintiffs, made sure that we always kept the court records up to date as to our address and other contact information. So it may not be wise to ignore a judgement if you ever want to take out a new mortgage, or refinance, or even get another credit card. I would be looking for ways to fight this, if possible. I don't know if small claims judgements are final.
Thanks,
Paul