ORIGINAL: JTorres
It`s easily understood that a "builder" that says a SIG kit is a bad kit is not a builder at all, and most certainly does not know what`s talking about. We must forgive you for your mistake of talking bad about SIG.
SIG is an Institution, an R/C Leyend, you should appologize. Respectfully, JT
Lets see what we have here. It would be easy to make some snide remark to any post and start a flamming war but it is not addressing the problem.
The origional complaint was that he received a kit from sig that had ALL the wood warped, which in 50 years of kit building was only seen in a kit that was in a flooded basement.
I really don't know what his intent was in the post but the advise was to contact Sig and let tHem know that there was a problem and they would resolve it. Yes Sig is an institution in the hobby business. and a company does not survive for 52 years unless it offers quality products and the service to go with those products. That is not some '
builder' talking but simply good business sense on Sigs part
Now the part that I find interesting is that this individual who complains about Sigs lack of ethics, in selling him a bad kit will go on Ebay and sell this 'bad' kit to recoup some of his money back. There seems to be a conflict in ethics here.
As to a builder there have been too many people in this thread who have affirmed their affinity for Sig kits for any one individual to have to champion this or any other company that comes up for discussion on these boards.
Finally as we are all talking from a distance there is a real good chance that someones feelings are going to get hurt when that is not the intention of most people who post on these boards. We are supposed to be broad minded enough to realize that there is a wide latitude for interpritation of any remarks made on these forums. Dennis