Your right Scott, that's why I stated that I have been guilty in the past of clouded judgment with regards to early flight reports. The Razzle is a textbook example of lighter flys better, (after adding carbon fiber to the stabs), which I shouldn't have had to do in the first place. I have now moved completely to gassers, and foamy type electrics exclusively. In fact I am selling all the rest my glow this fall to finance my next 28-30%
My point is that I have learned from my over zealous quick fingered flight reports..or at least I hope I have.
I'm not trashing CA products, nor their owners.
I'm in the market every fall for my next project, and this year it is another 50cc aerobat.
I'm compiling facts and data right now and the CA 2.3 is in the mix, however I don't want to have to put a 75 or 80 in it to fly it like I need to have it preform.
(Did that make sense?)
Factors that carry weight in my decision are customer service, repair ability, cost, performance with my given engine choice (DA~50), company reputation, and parts availability and cost as well as performance data, total all up weight included.
So when I come off as a wee bit abrasive, I apologize.
Gathering facts and data, separating the wheat from the chaff is sometimes tough to do, and only facts will do...not excuses or justifiable modifications needed for the plane to preform satisfactory or to manufactures's claims.

I hope I have cleared up my scrutiny.
Thanks to all.