RE: 2005 sequences
I looked at both of the Unlimited proposals last night --Much better than the sequences in the past - at least my opinion.
The BUT tho -is that they are still very busy sequences.
Stuff like 3/4 snap downline & 1 1/4 roll (Prop B fig 7) are fun to fly --but may get a 9 or a zero at the same time-
Again, a judging thing. Ditto for fig 8.
I am with Larry on the concept of "evolved " Especially for known sequences, which would make an orderly progression of learning thru the classes.
The Unknowns can be as involved as rules permit -which should satisfies the " who has the biggest ----" competitors.
I have done CD work at a number of contests plus stared into the sun for hours in the judges chair. Regardless of how many complex sequences are thrown in - the most practiced fliers typically win.
I know -'cause I simply don't practice enough.
However , the judges' job get's harder and the time to fly the sequences increases AND the need for a biggest plane and largest flight box increases.
So - How about a reality check????