RCU Forums - View Single Post - AMA and Disabilities
View Single Post
Old 02-11-2005 | 11:19 PM
  #176  
TexasAirBoss's Avatar
TexasAirBoss
My Feedback: (22)
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 2,972
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Houston, TX
Default RE: AMA and Disabilities

ORIGINAL: F106A



March 18, 2004

Attn: Ken Obeshaw

Officers and Board of Directors of the R/C Fliers of Venice Fl.

In response to the event which occurred last week when you became physically incapacitated and unable to control your plane, we the officers and Board of Directors of the R/C Fliers request that you:

1. Relinquish your instructor's status and cease teaching prospective new pilots to fly. Should you have anyone in training now, turn them over to another instructor.

2. Curtail your personal flying activities to (Assisted Flying), using a buddy box with a competent pilot or have a competent pilot assist you while you

are flying so they may take over control should this problem recur

It is with deep regret that we have to take this stance, however, in lieu of the safety factors involved we have no choice.

Sincerely

Allen Wilder

President, R/C Fliers of Venice, Inc.



South County Heart Center

1225 Jacaranda Blvd. Veniice, Fl. 34292

Patient: Obeshaw, Kenneth
Account # 8694
DOB: 12/13/31
Date: 05/18/04


Mr. Allen Wilder
President- R/C Fliers of Venice, Inc.

To Whom It May Concern:

Kenneth should be medically cleared to continue flying radio-controlled flyers and should be able to continue teaching. Kenneth has an inplantable defibrillator and dilated cardiomyopathy, however, his defibrillator went off inappropriately due to an atrial arrhythmia. His defibrillator was reprogrammed and he should not have any inappropriate shocks. From a cardiovascular standpoint, Kenneth should be stable to continue both teaching and flying radio-controlled flyers.

If there are any questions regarding this matter, please do not hesitate to call.

Sincerely,

L.J.E. D.O.,F.A.C.C.
I see this event occurred March 2004. It appears that Kenneth's doctor responded two months after Kenneth was notified of his non-solo status.
If the BOD considered the doctor's letter too vague, why has it taken so long to state that ?
It appears Kenneth's doctor was very willing to cooperate with him. He could have written another letter the very next day . Or they could have called the doctor. The doctor's letter even invited the interested parties to call him if they had questions. That is extraordinary for a doctor to offer "To Whom it May Concern" an ivitation to call and discuss a patients health history !!! Did the board decide Kenneth's non-solo status should last one year ? Is there a new BOD? Is the new BOD's attitude toward Kenneth different than the old BOD's ?