RCU Forums - View Single Post - .52 or .61 engine for Cox Tailwind Trainer 40??
Old 10-06-2005 | 09:12 AM
  #2  
glowplug
Senior Member
My Feedback: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 1,860
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Weirton, WV
Default RE: .52 or .61 engine for Cox Tailwind Trainer 40??

Jim, the plane might be big, but it's light. Trainers are designed to have a lot of lift (the wing probably looks very big to you). With all of that lift, it takes less power for the plane to fly. A good, ball-bearing .46-.52 should be more than enough power for the plane. A .61 will be considerably heavier, which might give you some balancing issues, and raise the overall weight of the plane, which is something you want to try to avoid in a trainer. Sometimes over-powering a plane is definitely a good idea, but I have yet to see a .40-sized trainer that needed to be overpowered.