Go Back  RCU Forums > RC Airplanes > Beginners
 .52 or .61 engine for Cox Tailwind Trainer 40?? >

.52 or .61 engine for Cox Tailwind Trainer 40??

Community
Search
Notices
Beginners Beginners in RC start here for help.

.52 or .61 engine for Cox Tailwind Trainer 40??

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-06-2005 | 08:58 AM
  #1  
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 49
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Anderson, CA
Default .52 or .61 engine for Cox Tailwind Trainer 40??

Well I just got the Cox Tailwind trainer 40. Workmanship to my eyes(Beginner's) looks pretty good. I got this ARF cause there is a good chance I will have a few mishaps and the cost of the plane will soften these mishaps. The box states 5.5 lbs flying weight and indicates a engine from .40 to .51. But the plane looks pretty large and I think a .40 engine may not be the engine of choice.
So I am thinking of a .61 engine rather than the .51 engine. I need comments on my choice of engine and suggestions of some engines to consider.....one that will have the least noise as possible.

Thank You, Lakeviewjim
Old 10-06-2005 | 09:12 AM
  #2  
Senior Member
My Feedback: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 1,860
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Weirton, WV
Default RE: .52 or .61 engine for Cox Tailwind Trainer 40??

Jim, the plane might be big, but it's light. Trainers are designed to have a lot of lift (the wing probably looks very big to you). With all of that lift, it takes less power for the plane to fly. A good, ball-bearing .46-.52 should be more than enough power for the plane. A .61 will be considerably heavier, which might give you some balancing issues, and raise the overall weight of the plane, which is something you want to try to avoid in a trainer. Sometimes over-powering a plane is definitely a good idea, but I have yet to see a .40-sized trainer that needed to be overpowered.
Old 10-06-2005 | 10:13 AM
  #3  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 3,299
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
From: Deep River, ON, CANADA
Default RE: .52 or .61 engine for Cox Tailwind Trainer 40??

Agree with glowplug. A plainbearing .40/46 will be acceptable, a good BB 40 will be more than acceptable, & a good BB .46 or 51 will be much more than necessary for training. A .61 will be too much -- 60 size engines are notably larger & heavier than 46's.
Old 10-06-2005 | 10:57 AM
  #4  
MinnFlyer's Avatar
Senior Member
My Feedback: (4)
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 28,519
Likes: 0
Received 9 Likes on 9 Posts
From: Willmar, MN
Default RE: .52 or .61 engine for Cox Tailwind Trainer 40??

Another vote for a BB46
Old 10-06-2005 | 11:11 AM
  #5  
My Feedback: (1)
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 3,785
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: MS
Default RE: .52 or .61 engine for Cox Tailwind Trainer 40??

The wingloading of your trainer is on 19 oz./sq. ft. That is light. It will do nicely with a BB46. I would recommend a Thunder Tiger Pro46. It is an excellent engine and a great value.
Old 10-06-2005 | 02:08 PM
  #6  
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 49
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Anderson, CA
Default RE: .52 or .61 engine for Cox Tailwind Trainer 40??

Thanks a million, I will go with the TT pro 46, All of you have a great day making lots of money...

Jim

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are On



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.