3dbob,

"Logic simply escapes them entirely" [:'(] Bob I will disagree. If you mean me, I work in the IT area where logic is the rule of life. I know you do not have a weak mind so, why even go that way.

I just brought up 2 issues that would save the AMA money. In return that would be a better management of the money we send the AMA.

As you know the top 2 issues with most of the AMA's clients is MA and the monster field at Muncie that I will guess less than 2% of the AMA's clients uses. I could be wrong. I went there 2 years ago and it is huge.

Yes, the AMA is so much more. But why not address the top 2 issues with the AMA's clients? It is always easy to attempt to put down other people that you do not have any knowledge of. "some folks simply can't focus on the big picture and see the world through a narrow set of lenses" That is just weak.

I will have to "assume" there is no reason to keep the fields except we have the money so why not spend it. I will also "assume" the same fo MA.

There are some would say why can not some people grasp the idea of being a good steward of the funds that I have been placed in charge of? The goal should be "We should make our clients happy to spend money with us."

Tier membership sounds good. Cutting back on the amount of fields is good management of the funds we have been given. Where is the logic on the way the AMA is spending their money in the 2 above areas?

Crash99
pb1143