RCU Forums - View Single Post - Pusher design
View Single Post
Old 10-14-2005 | 07:24 PM
  #3  
khodges
My Feedback: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 5,587
Received 28 Likes on 25 Posts
From: newton, NC
Default RE: Pusher design


ORIGINAL: Jim Finn

What is the advantage of a pusher prop arrangement on a full size B-36 For example? Why was it designed that way?
At least part of the reason for mounting the engines "backwards" was for streamlining. The leading edge of the Peacemaker was swept, and the engines were 28 cylinder R-4360's with 3800 hp each. For the propeller to clear the leading edge, the engines would have had to be mounted forward of the leading edge, much like the B-29's, which is an aerodynamically dirty design. The trailing edge is almost perpendicular to the fuse, so no problem with prop clearance. The wing section of the B-36 was so large that there was an accessway inside the wing that the flight engineer could reach the engines through.

I always thought the B-52 was a big airplane, saw many on the ramps whenever we flew into Carswell, but the B-36 absolutely dwarfs them.