RCU Forums - View Single Post - AMA Response was Disappointing!
View Single Post
Old 11-03-2005 | 05:05 PM
  #22  
Giw252
My Feedback: (4)
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 32
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
From: Louisville, OH
Default RE: AMA Response was Disappointing!

I've been reading through the posts again and think I have an idea that leaves out lawyers, small claims and crashed models. Our club should try and talk with these fellows for a second time to see if they would like to join our club. If they don't want to join, maybe we could help them find a new location not so close to our field. Now I know they have a right to fly in their current location, I won't deny or argue with anyone on this point. But common sense tells us that: (A. Our club should not have to move as we have a great deal more invested in our site then they with theirs. I'm not putting down their field, but all it consists of is one small area for flite operations. No port -o- john, no tables or work stands, no tx impound, nothing. They have nothing of monetary value invested in the property. They could move to another site with little loss to no loss.) (B. A frequency sharing agreement just is not going to work for both practical and legal reasons.) If these guys want a small private club thats fine by me. But why does it have to be right next door to ours? I just don't understand why they continue to fly so close to us knowing that there is a an RF problem that exists because of the relative close range to each other. The only conclusion I can come to is that they just don't care. Their lack of respect for their fellow modelers is the saddest part of this entire story.

Tom, I completely agree and I couldn't have said it any better!