ORIGINAL: JohnW
"Most people seem to think that because they get more revs using an APC then they must be better. What it really means is that, for one reason or another, the APC isn't as good at converting HP into thrust."
I don't believe we can draw that conclusion without more evidence. Why couldn't it be that brand X prop gets more RPM because it has less drag? That would actually make it more efficient in converting HP into thrust...
Only if it's actually generating more thrust. It could also be generating less thrust. The problem is many people never go so far as to measure the thrust or speed. They put the prop on, get more RPMs and conclude that it's more efficient and therefore better. Then since they've already convinced themselves that the prop is better, they perceive that it's also better in the air, perhaps partly from hearing that the engine is turning faster. I accept that some people actually measure and conclude a particular prop works better for their plane/engine combination, but many just go by what they hear from others or conclude from the engine turning higher RPMs.