Engine for CA 24% Extra
#2
That would be a great engine and should have no problem with unlimited vert. An os 160 is about $200 less, has similar power, lighter, and uses $10 a gallon fuel, and is more fuel efficient. With the small wing on this plane it will need to be under 11 lbs ready to fly, probably as close to 10 lbs as you can get.
#3
Senior Member
My Feedback: (17)
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 1,592
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Boisbriand,
QC, CANADA
Hi,
Pay attention to that thread before building it!!
http://www.rcuniverse.com/forum/Wing...1077535/tm.htm
11lbs is the maximum and getting the CG is a big challenge, specillay with a glow engine...[X(]
Scoubidou
Pay attention to that thread before building it!!
http://www.rcuniverse.com/forum/Wing...1077535/tm.htm
11lbs is the maximum and getting the CG is a big challenge, specillay with a glow engine...[X(]
Scoubidou
#4
Senior Member
My Feedback: (19)
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 2,156
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Evansville, IN
Cancel the order quickly and build the 27% with a small gasser. I didnt keep my 24% a month before selling mostly due to being too tail heavy to land without flopping. The 24% just runs out of wing IMO. I was expecting a smaller size plane like my GP patty wagstaff, not even close IMO
#5
Thread Starter
Senior Member
I've got the kit sitting at home now and am getting ready to start the fuselage. I'm still trying to decide on an engine for it. My first thought has been the YS 140 Sport (as I posted above) but I've been investigating others as well.
How about an RCS 1.40 gas engine for this plane? Good or bad points? Better or worse than the YS? It seems to weigh in similar to the YS but uses cheap fuel (and less of it). I've also considered a 2 stroke (OS 1.6 or Moki 1.8)
Chris
How about an RCS 1.40 gas engine for this plane? Good or bad points? Better or worse than the YS? It seems to weigh in similar to the YS but uses cheap fuel (and less of it). I've also considered a 2 stroke (OS 1.6 or Moki 1.8)
Chris



