Go Back  RCU Forums > RC Airplanes > 3D Flying!
 U-Can-Do 3D 46 Engine Question >

U-Can-Do 3D 46 Engine Question

Community
Search
Notices
3D Flying! Our 3D flying forum is the ultimate resource for 3D flyers. Also discuss the latest in "4D" flying!

U-Can-Do 3D 46 Engine Question

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-15-2004 | 02:35 AM
  #1  
Thread Starter
Senior Member
My Feedback: (4)
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 174
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Austin, TX
Default U-Can-Do 3D 46 Engine Question

Getting this plane pretty soon. A guy recommended a Evolution .61 motor for it. He said it will pull out better during hovering. The motor is only $119 so I might get that, but only if it's a good setup for this plane. Is there any other engines that will pull out during hovering at the price around $100?? Or what type of engine are you guys running for your UCD46?

Thanks,
Tomi
Old 02-15-2004 | 08:14 AM
  #2  
NeoGenesis's Avatar
My Feedback: (27)
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 916
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Findlay, OH
Default RE: U-Can-Do 3D 46 Engine Question

Saito 1.00 Save you money casue it's worth it. Everything else is just a waste of time. A 2 stroke doesn't do this plane justice.




Neo
Old 02-15-2004 | 10:45 AM
  #3  
My Feedback: (24)
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 1,898
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: sparta, TN
Default RE: U-Can-Do 3D 46 Engine Question

satio 100=O+yea=[8D]
Old 02-15-2004 | 11:53 AM
  #4  
Nik's Avatar
Nik
Senior Member
My Feedback: (12)
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 286
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Painted Post, NY
Default RE: U-Can-Do 3D 46 Engine Question

I strongly disagree!
We have a guy at our field that flew a Ucan 40 with TT .61 ($100, I have it too, runs awesome!) and one with a saito 91 or 100 (Not sure)
The saito had abit better acceleration out a hover, but I think it's not worth the price...
-Nik
ORIGINAL: NeoGenesis

Saito 1.00 Save you money casue it's worth it. Everything else is just a waste of time. A 2 stroke doesn't do this plane justice.




Neo
Old 02-15-2004 | 06:04 PM
  #5  
Thread Starter
Senior Member
My Feedback: (4)
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 174
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Austin, TX
Default RE: U-Can-Do 3D 46 Engine Question

I ain't payin no $280 for a peice of metal.

anway, I went out and looked at the Evolution .61 motor and it looks very nice with blue anodized parts. $119 for the motor. I'm gonna get it. My LHS said a friend of his is currently flying one and is using the evolution .61 motor and it pulls out during hover good.

Also, what prop size is recommended with this setup?
Old 02-15-2004 | 09:10 PM
  #6  
My Feedback: (24)
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 1,898
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: sparta, TN
Default RE: U-Can-Do 3D 46 Engine Question

well you asked for the good setup? two stroke don't go with 3d. but i would say to get were a two stroke makes power a apc 12.25/3.75 if it will turn 14,500+ with it satio 100 16/4 10,000 much different in it.

i really don't think you will like the plane with a two stroke. it was made for a four stroke .


also a satio or ys is much more than a peice of metal. much more indead.
Old 02-16-2004 | 05:09 PM
  #7  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 2,353
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Up north, ND
Default RE: U-Can-Do 3D 46 Engine Question

everyone mentioned you need a 4 stroke, no one said why...

better braking, swings a larger prop (more stable), better power at lower rpm and better transition, anyone else think of any others?
Old 02-16-2004 | 06:36 PM
  #8  
joebob's Avatar
My Feedback: (14)
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 759
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Crestview, FL
Default RE: U-Can-Do 3D 46 Engine Question

They sound cool!
Old 02-17-2004 | 03:55 PM
  #9  
motodude11's Avatar
Senior Member
My Feedback: (1)
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 865
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: baltic, CT
Default RE: U-Can-Do 3D 46 Engine Question

webra 50gt is the perfect motor for this plane!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! 2 STROKES FOR EVER!!!!!!!!!! on a dirtbike or in a plane a two stroke kicks you know what!!!!! Hey just my 2 cents

Josh
Old 02-17-2004 | 06:49 PM
  #10  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 118
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Stuttgart, AR
Default RE: U-Can-Do 3D 46 Engine Question

IMHO, I would go with the Saito 91. The money is worth it if you can afford it. For the weight/hp ratio, you can't argue. I used to run a OS50sx swinging a 12x4 zinger prop on it and it flew but no hover or vertical climb. Yea a two stroke has turn up speed, but a 4 stroke has the horse power to swing a big prop critical for 3D. I'm using an APC 15x4W prop. I can take off and roll about 10 feet and pull back and go straight vertical. Awsome power for the plane. The only time you want to throw the gas to this motor is ONLY in vertical climb. DON'T do it in horizontal or decline flight!

OH yea..... it sounds cool! hehe
Old 02-18-2004 | 09:14 AM
  #11  
joebob's Avatar
My Feedback: (14)
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 759
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Crestview, FL
Default RE: U-Can-Do 3D 46 Engine Question

I love the Saito .91 in mine, and I've never been one to say something has too much power, but I could go vert all day and never use over 1/2 throttle. Most of the time I'm just a few clicks above idle. I'm gonna do an experiment next time I get out to the field. I'm gonna pull it into a hover, then count the clicks above idle I am. When I get back on the ground, I'm gonna tach the engine at that throttle level and see what RPM it takes to hover it.
Old 02-26-2004 | 09:54 PM
  #12  
Junior Member
My Feedback: (6)
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 11
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Windsor, CO
Default RE: U-Can-Do 3D 46 Engine Question

I had a ys .63 in mine and it didn't have what was needed. I then went to a Saito 100 with a 15x4 prop and 20/20 fuel. Now the plane is fun to fly and has the power this plane needs.
Old 02-29-2004 | 07:08 PM
  #13  
Junior Member
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Grove, OK
Default RE: U-Can-Do 3D 46 Engine Question

I have one with a Saito 72 with a APC 15x4w prop running 30% heli fuel. More than enough power and the weight savings help a lot with flight performance. Great plane to help with your 3D practice.
Old 02-29-2004 | 07:14 PM
  #14  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 2,756
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Brandon, MS
Default RE: U-Can-Do 3D 46 Engine Question

Cowplane, are you sure thats not a 14 x 4W on that 72?

Ed M.
Old 02-29-2004 | 11:44 PM
  #15  
DMehalko's Avatar
My Feedback: (42)
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 1,497
Received 9 Likes on 6 Posts
From: Denver, CO
Default RE: U-Can-Do 3D 46 Engine Question

IMHO, I would go with the Saito 91. The money is worth it if you can afford it. For the weight/hp ratio, you can't argue. I used to run a OS50sx swinging a 12x4 zinger prop on it and it flew but no hover or vertical climb. Yea a two stroke has turn up speed, but a 4 stroke has the horse power to swing a big prop critical for 3D. I'm using an APC 15x4W prop. I can take off and roll about 10 feet and pull back and go straight vertical. Awsome power for the plane. The only time you want to throw the gas to this motor is ONLY in vertical climb. DON'T do it in horizontal or decline flight!
Im gonna have to aggree. They swing the larger props needed for 3d.
The instance that i can think of using a 2 stroke over a 4 stroke is in racing airplanes, they have the higher rpm for those greater speeds while the 4 strokes got the tourqe.

David-

UcanDo 3D/w Satio 1.00
Old 03-01-2004 | 07:55 AM
  #16  
sensei's Avatar
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 2,829
Received 17 Likes on 15 Posts
From: SAN ANTONIO, TX
Default RE: U-Can-Do 3D 46 Engine Question

Hello Tomi

I have a UCD 46 with a OS 50 and a APC 12x4 prop, and this thing rocks. the Evo 61 should be a very good choice. You live in Austin, and I`m down the road in San Antonio, if you want to fly before you buy, I will let you fly mine. This will allow you to make a educated decision.

Bob Sawyer
Old 03-01-2004 | 06:19 PM
  #17  
Junior Member
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 16
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Charlotte, NC,
Default RE: U-Can-Do 3D 46 Engine Question

A good friend of mine runs a YS .63 on his UCD.46. He has had nothing but great performance with this set-up. The YS is a bit pricey but worth it. I bought the exact set-up for myself a few days ago and cant wait for it to get to my door step so i can get it put together and in the air!
Old 03-02-2004 | 12:21 AM
  #18  
Hypter's Avatar
My Feedback: (2)
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 291
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Columbus, OH
Default RE: U-Can-Do 3D 46 Engine Question

I had to agree on the 4-Strokes. I have a Saito72 on mine with a 14x4w APC. That Evolution engine may be cheaper than a Saito, and I have heard its a good engine and a great price. But the price your going to pay is the weight of the engine, 26oz -- around 10oz heavier than the Saito. This is definetly a plane you want to keep light. If a Saito is out of your price range, check out some of the other 4-Strokes, Magnum and TT make nice ones at decent prices.

BTW, the Evolution .61 was on my list of engine choices for this plane.

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are On



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.