Go Back  RCU Forums > RC Airplanes > 3D Flying!
Bevel on Control Surfaces >

Bevel on Control Surfaces

Community
Search
Notices
3D Flying! Our 3D flying forum is the ultimate resource for 3D flyers. Also discuss the latest in "4D" flying!

Bevel on Control Surfaces

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-20-2002 | 08:08 PM
  #1  
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 47
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Wauchula, FL
Default Bevel on Control Surfaces

I'm Building a Weeks Solution X Biplane. I want to set it up to do 3D. My question is, on the tail surfaces should I put a 45 degree bevel on the control surfaces only l< or should I bevel both the control and the fixed surfaces. >< . I've seen it done both ways, what are the pros and cons.
Old 06-20-2002 | 08:35 PM
  #2  
MarkNovack's Avatar
Senior Member
My Feedback: (3)
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 1,552
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
From: Nameche, BELGIUM
Default Try this solution.

I prefer a 30 degree on the control surface and a fifteen degree on the trailing edge of the stab and fin (aileron is fine at 10 and 25).

This prevents from having a very delicate, sharp bevel face on the control surface. The other reason I do this is because when control surfaces on large aircraft are very thick at the hinge line, it helps to keep the horn forwards to the pivot line. Beveling a 2" thick control surface 45 degrees means the horn must be mounted 1" behind the hinge line.

Mark
Old 06-20-2002 | 08:45 PM
  #3  
Senior Member
My Feedback: (25)
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 1,579
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Bevel on Control Surfaces

Hey there,

I was in the shop with my cousin the other day (Warren Thomas), and he was building an airplane, and he said that the double bevel ( >< ) is better because you can eek a little more throw that way, and if it is just beveled on one side, he showed me that there will be a little "ridge" that the control surface makes. An example of this I mean that the aileron on the wing will be about 1/8 of an inch higher than the wing. I don't know how big of an aerodynamic disadvantage that this would pose, but it looks better in my opinion.

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are On



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.