OS 91 FX in Seduction
#5
Senior Member
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 321
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: South, NEW ZEALAND
From a previous post
That means the 91 would be perfect!!
You guys are all chicken
The 91 fx is PERFECT for this little beast. Lets compare weights. The current worlds "perfect" engine is the YS 63
specs
Displacement: .623 cubic inches
Compression Ratio: 9.5:1
Operating Range: 2,000 to 12,000 RPM
Weight: 17.9 oz
Take note of that 17.9 oz weight
Now us in New Zealand think that this is far to tame, look at this
.91 FX
Displacement: 0.912
Operating Range: 2,000-16,000
Output (BHP@rpm): 2.8 @ 15,000
Weight: 19.3oz
Now thats less than 2 oz in difference so I say give it a try
should be unbelievable power!!
A very famous flyer in Taiwan. He said that the FreeStyle with the YS-63 is "way" too much power!!
You guys are all chicken
The 91 fx is PERFECT for this little beast. Lets compare weights. The current worlds "perfect" engine is the YS 63specs
Displacement: .623 cubic inches
Compression Ratio: 9.5:1
Operating Range: 2,000 to 12,000 RPM
Weight: 17.9 oz
Take note of that 17.9 oz weight
Now us in New Zealand think that this is far to tame, look at this
.91 FX
Displacement: 0.912
Operating Range: 2,000-16,000
Output (BHP@rpm): 2.8 @ 15,000
Weight: 19.3oz
Now thats less than 2 oz in difference so I say give it a try
should be unbelievable power!!
#7

My Feedback: (6)
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 94
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Bellingham,
MA
Um, that weight spec'd above is WITHOUT the muffler!
This is the specs on the OS 91fx
SPECS:
Displacement: 14.95cc (0.912 cu in)
RPM range: 2,000 - 16,000 Bore: 27.7mm (1.090")
Stroke: 24.8 mm (0.976")
Compression Ratio: 10.1 : 1
Weight: 550g (19.42oz) 24.3 oz w/muffler
And the ys 63:
SPECS:
Bore: 1.03" (26.2mm)
Stroke: 0.74" (19.0mm)
Practical RPM: 2,000-15,000 rpm
Horsepower: Not given, contact YS
Crankshaft thread size: 8 x 1mm
Weight with muffler: 1.11 lbs (17.11oz)
So that is a difference of 7.19oz. Make your own judgement if you want to add that much weight.
This is the specs on the OS 91fx
SPECS:
Displacement: 14.95cc (0.912 cu in)
RPM range: 2,000 - 16,000 Bore: 27.7mm (1.090")
Stroke: 24.8 mm (0.976")
Compression Ratio: 10.1 : 1
Weight: 550g (19.42oz) 24.3 oz w/muffler
And the ys 63:
SPECS:
Bore: 1.03" (26.2mm)
Stroke: 0.74" (19.0mm)
Practical RPM: 2,000-15,000 rpm
Horsepower: Not given, contact YS
Crankshaft thread size: 8 x 1mm
Weight with muffler: 1.11 lbs (17.11oz)
So that is a difference of 7.19oz. Make your own judgement if you want to add that much weight.
#8
Senior Member
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 321
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: South, NEW ZEALAND
Run it without muffler then
It would have a nice throaty big-bore sound.... I wasnt being serious, I fly with Matrix140 so he deserves some for asking a question like that. I still think a 91 in a 40 sized airframe would be pretty cool, how about hovering on the throttle trim.
It would have a nice throaty big-bore sound.... I wasnt being serious, I fly with Matrix140 so he deserves some for asking a question like that. I still think a 91 in a 40 sized airframe would be pretty cool, how about hovering on the throttle trim.



