Engine for U Can Do 60
#1
Hi everybody I have been flying my trainer for about 4 months and the guys at my field say I am flying my trainer to the limit. As my next plane I have decided on the UCD. I will fly a little pattern with it first so my 3d will be more percise. Any way I haven't got an engine yet and was thinking of a saito 91 or 1.00 at $220.00 and $250.00 or an O.S. 91 2 stroke at $230.00. I was wondering if any one has any suggestions on an engine.
#2
Senior Member
Do a search for thread titled ' u can do 3d ' it has alot of data (over 50 pages of posts if memory serves)
Either Saito mentioned should work fine. more is better even if you do not use it all majority of time.
Either Saito mentioned should work fine. more is better even if you do not use it all majority of time.
#4
Senior Member
My Feedback: (4)
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 254
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Hymera,
IN
Got a Saito 1.00 in mine and love it. Throttle management is a must!!! At low rates and half throttle, you will find that this is eazier to fly then your trainer. Told so by a student pilot still on his trainer, whom I let fly my UCD and did vey well I might add. But when you go to high rates, LOOK OUT, you have moster on your hands, beginners 3D style.
Richard

Richard
#5
Senior Member
My Feedback: (1)
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 2,279
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Clarks Summit, PA
If you want to experience everything that the UCD .60 has to offer, consider a YS 110. It costs more, but will repay you 10 fold in pleasure and performance. Good luck with your decision. Joe
#7
Senior Member
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 111
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: northampton, UNITED KINGDOM
Agree with rcs36, I have the Saito 100 in mine, and have found it to be the perfect combo. Im turning an APC 15x4w prop, and theres just enough power to pull out of a hover. love this plane.
#8

My Feedback: (20)
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 285
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: NC
If you are serious about 3D flight, then the Y.S. 1.10 is the way to go. I have flown various UCDs with different powerplants. My first one had an O.S. .91 four stroke w/ pump. It flew the plane great. I could hover, but pull out was sluggish. I have flown a buddies with a Saito 1.00 and it has better pull out but not nearly the authority of the Y.S. 1.10. If you are going to be hovering inches off the ground, you want gobs of extra thrust at your disposal and you want the dependability that the Y.S. pressurized fuel system can give you.
#9
Senior Member
My Feedback: (1)
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 2,279
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Clarks Summit, PA
ORIGINAL: contempo
If you are serious about 3D flight, then the Y.S. 1.10 is the way to go. I have flown various UCDs with different powerplants. My first one had an O.S. .91 four stroke w/ pump. It flew the plane great. I could hover, but pull out was sluggish. I have flown a buddies with a Saito 1.00 and it has better pull out but not nearly the authority of the Y.S. 1.10. If you are going to be hovering inches off the ground, you want gobs of extra thrust at your disposal and you want the dependability that the Y.S. pressurized fuel system can give you.
If you are serious about 3D flight, then the Y.S. 1.10 is the way to go. I have flown various UCDs with different powerplants. My first one had an O.S. .91 four stroke w/ pump. It flew the plane great. I could hover, but pull out was sluggish. I have flown a buddies with a Saito 1.00 and it has better pull out but not nearly the authority of the Y.S. 1.10. If you are going to be hovering inches off the ground, you want gobs of extra thrust at your disposal and you want the dependability that the Y.S. pressurized fuel system can give you.




