mvvs 160 gasser for 3D
#1
Thread Starter

Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 91
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Teia, SPAIN
I am looking for a plane that is capable of 3D with an MVVS 160 gasser in it. What would you recommend to be the maximum size-weight to look for?
Thanks in advance,
Joan
Thanks in advance,
Joan
#3
Senior Member
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 1,140
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Chester, UNITED KINGDOM
I have one in a H9 Edge .... it's OK but not enough for unlimited vertical. it does most 3D stuff easily, but harriers and hovers are limited to right by the floor.
Apparently the h9 Edge which is smaller has even worse performance than the Edge with this engine...... fantastic engine tthough, I fly mine at the UK shows.... seldom lets me down!
Apparently the h9 Edge which is smaller has even worse performance than the Edge with this engine...... fantastic engine tthough, I fly mine at the UK shows.... seldom lets me down!
#6
Senior Member
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 1,140
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Chester, UNITED KINGDOM
MY Edge is 12lbs. Attached is a pic of it in the harrier...... this takes about 1-2/3 throttle, fully vertical takes full throttle, so not really the right engine for the model, but not too bad. The glow version would be perfect.
#7

My Feedback: (506)
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 2,429
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: St. Thomas, VIRGIN ISLANDS (USA)
I'm going to put one into an AK-Models Somethin Bigg<eraseraserase> 3D Freedom. This plane weighs 8.5 lbs RTF with an OS 1.20 four stroke, so 10 lbs with the MVVS should be easy. Hell, with the stock muffler the MVVS weighs less than 5 oz. more than the 4C...
#8
Hey Welsh,
Nice looking harrier! What prop are you using with this combo? I am putting one of these motors in a Creek Hobbies Extra 330. I don't know which prop to use so any help you can give will be a help. Thanks, I am hoping for 11.5 lbs on my Extra. Hope it is not too much of a dog... OH well
Thanks
Nice looking harrier! What prop are you using with this combo? I am putting one of these motors in a Creek Hobbies Extra 330. I don't know which prop to use so any help you can give will be a help. Thanks, I am hoping for 11.5 lbs on my Extra. Hope it is not too much of a dog... OH well
Thanks
#9
Senior Member
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 1,140
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Chester, UNITED KINGDOM
prop is an APC 16x8..... I preferred Mejzlik but damaged an end of that prop following a wheel locking up taxying- bit of a shame really as the damage was incredibly small, but i think too much to make it usable.
Should be fine...... i'm using the spoileron mix..... hopefulyl with hat on permanently during the harrier it will be even more steady.
Should be fine...... i'm using the spoileron mix..... hopefulyl with hat on permanently during the harrier it will be even more steady.
#10
Senior Member
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 289
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Birchwood, MN
I just got my AK-Models 3D Freedom yesterday and have only had a chance to inspect the box contents. Very nice wood, laser cut, and quality thoughout. The kit engineering is excellent with well designed light, but strong, parts. Tomorrow I will take the CAD plans to Kinkos to make a building copy. I hope to start building this weekend.
The current selling price is $124.95 with free shipping, and I think it's a bargain. See:
http://www.ak-models.com/3dfreedom.htm
I am going to try to build the kit and cover it as much as possible so that I have a good idea of the weight resulting from my building style, R/C equipment, balance, etc. I usually build using mostly white glue and try to minimize the epoxy.
After I have built it as far as I can, I will select an engine. Like visioneer_one I would like to try gas. There should be a fuel load weight savings because of a smaller tank and about half as much fuel compared with glow.
Anybody flying one yet?
Bruce
The current selling price is $124.95 with free shipping, and I think it's a bargain. See:
http://www.ak-models.com/3dfreedom.htm
I am going to try to build the kit and cover it as much as possible so that I have a good idea of the weight resulting from my building style, R/C equipment, balance, etc. I usually build using mostly white glue and try to minimize the epoxy.
After I have built it as far as I can, I will select an engine. Like visioneer_one I would like to try gas. There should be a fuel load weight savings because of a smaller tank and about half as much fuel compared with glow.
Anybody flying one yet?
Bruce
#14
Senior Member
Yes, and it won't give muh of a power advantage over a YS 140L. For some reason, people are forgeting that lighter planes are better flying planes. Its not the amount of horses you an pack under the cowl. For the G-Trick, I would go with a YS 110.
#15
Thread Starter

Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 91
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Teia, SPAIN
Robert,
Maybe I am missing something. I am looking for a plane for my first gasser that I would like it to be an MVVS 1.6. I am not looking for a power advantage but I do not want less power than with a glow. The G-Trick is designed for an YS91 that weights 750g. Many people are powering them with an YS120 that weights 880g. I am supossing that the MVVS is producing aproximately the same amount of power and it weights 1050g including the ignition. The difference in weight between it and the YS120 is easily offset by the smaller tank capacity needed due to better fuel economy. So, where is the weight penalty? Why donīt you think it is a suitable plane?
Maybe I am missing something. I am looking for a plane for my first gasser that I would like it to be an MVVS 1.6. I am not looking for a power advantage but I do not want less power than with a glow. The G-Trick is designed for an YS91 that weights 750g. Many people are powering them with an YS120 that weights 880g. I am supossing that the MVVS is producing aproximately the same amount of power and it weights 1050g including the ignition. The difference in weight between it and the YS120 is easily offset by the smaller tank capacity needed due to better fuel economy. So, where is the weight penalty? Why donīt you think it is a suitable plane?
#16
Senior Member
You said it yourself, 'The G-Trick is designed for an YS91' .
You will be adding 300grams to the front, so another 300 to the back to balance, plus a bit of extra glue here and there because I hear of quality issues. So, even by being generous, we are adding roughy 400grams to a feuled plane with a YS 91. If you want to put a gasser in something, look for something that is designed for a gasser. I hear all the time of people who say that they used to put big gas engines in all their planes, and thought it flew wonderfull. They then replaced it with a smaller, lighter glow, and it is just a whole new plane, alot better at everything!
But at the end, I suppose whatever makes you happy!
Rob.
You will be adding 300grams to the front, so another 300 to the back to balance, plus a bit of extra glue here and there because I hear of quality issues. So, even by being generous, we are adding roughy 400grams to a feuled plane with a YS 91. If you want to put a gasser in something, look for something that is designed for a gasser. I hear all the time of people who say that they used to put big gas engines in all their planes, and thought it flew wonderfull. They then replaced it with a smaller, lighter glow, and it is just a whole new plane, alot better at everything!
But at the end, I suppose whatever makes you happy!
Rob.



