Go Back  RCU Forums > RC Airplanes > 3D Flying!
Reload this Page >

AeroWorks Edge 540T 46-60?

Community
Search
Notices
3D Flying! Our 3D flying forum is the ultimate resource for 3D flyers. Also discuss the latest in "4D" flying!

AeroWorks Edge 540T 46-60?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-16-2010, 10:09 PM
  #1576  
heggen
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Wyoming, MN
Posts: 233
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: AeroWorks Edge 540T 46-60?

I have been flying my Aeroworks Edge and have not been able to overcome the "tail heavy" condition that seems to exist. Earlier, I wrote that I believed my Edge had some built in downthrut which I countered with about two degrees of up thrust because when I chopped throttle from wide open, the airplane would climb. That seemed to help. I have moved the rudder servo back to the tail and secured the battery pack just in front of the TE of the wing to bring the CG back to 3 1/2" behind the leading edge. Regardless the Edge still flies with up trim. That just ain't right. I had written earlier about this and have since learned that my earlier measurements were flawed. Must have bumped something when I was measuring with the incidence meter and have now learned that the wing is at about 1 1/2 degrees negative incidence. The stab and engine thrust line are 0 - 0, but the wing is at a negative incidence! It is nothing I have built in. That is the way the fuse was cut from the factory. To be sure, I measured repeatedly under different methods of measurments, i.e., levels, tri-square, rulers, incidence meter, and combinations of. It all comes out the same - negative 5/16" wing incidence.
My curiousity is, are all of you who are moving the CG back experiencing the same flying traits. Has anyone checked the incidence of their wing relative to the stab and thrust line?
I am am planning to drop the trailing edge of the wing about 5/16" at the trailing edge. This will bring everything to 0 -0 -0 where I expect it should have been.
I have to say, even with this horrid misalignment, the Edge with a Saito 91 is a nice flying airplane. Can't wait to hear your comments and also to get this thing back in the air.
Old 06-17-2010, 08:51 AM
  #1577  
heggen
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Wyoming, MN
Posts: 233
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: AeroWorks Edge 540T 46-60?

I woke up this morning and the first thing that popped into my head was that I had wrote "tail heavy" condition rather than the correct "nose heavy" condition in my comments late last night. Sorry for the initial confusion.
Old 06-17-2010, 08:43 PM
  #1578  
jmccartney
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: anchorage, AK
Posts: 23
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: AeroWorks Edge 540T 46-60?

been looking into this plane but have just one question how does the wing mount to the fuse i looked at the manual and it just shows the two bolts in the back of the wing and no pegs at the leading edge how does the front lock in any pics would be great thanks in advance
Old 06-17-2010, 11:51 PM
  #1579  
ro347
Senior Member
My Feedback: (13)
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Nutley, NJ
Posts: 2,322
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: AeroWorks Edge 540T 46-60?


ORIGINAL: jmccartney

been looking into this plane but have just one question how does the wing mount to the fuse i looked at the manual and it just shows the two bolts in the back of the wing and no pegs at the leading edge how does the front lock in any pics would be great thanks in advance
The one piece wing mounts in between the fuse and the canopy; by removing the canopy to lay the wing in and bolt down.
Old 06-18-2010, 08:21 AM
  #1580  
McChiken
Senior Member
 
McChiken's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Lodi, CA
Posts: 294
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: AeroWorks Edge 540T 46-60?


ORIGINAL: heggen

I have been flying my Aeroworks Edge and have not been able to overcome the ''tail heavy'' condition that seems to exist. Earlier, I wrote that I believed my Edge had some built in downthrut which I countered with about two degrees of up thrust because when I chopped throttle from wide open, the airplane would climb. That seemed to help. I have moved the rudder servo back to the tail and secured the battery pack just in front of the TE of the wing to bring the CG back to 3 1/2'' behind the leading edge. Regardless the Edge still flies with up trim. That just ain't right. I had written earlier about this and have since learned that my earlier measurements were flawed. Must have bumped something when I was measuring with the incidence meter and have now learned that the wing is at about 1 1/2 degrees negative incidence. The stab and engine thrust line are 0 - 0, but the wing is at a negative incidence! It is nothing I have built in. That is the way the fuse was cut from the factory. To be sure, I measured repeatedly under different methods of measurments, i.e., levels, tri-square, rulers, incidence meter, and combinations of. It all comes out the same - negative 5/16'' wing incidence.
My curiousity is, are all of you who are moving the CG back experiencing the same flying traits. Has anyone checked the incidence of their wing relative to the stab and thrust line?
I am am planning to drop the trailing edge of the wing about 5/16'' at the trailing edge. This will bring everything to 0 -0 -0 where I expect it should have been.
I have to say, even with this horrid misalignment, the Edge with a Saito 91 is a nice flying airplane. Can't wait to hear your comments and also to get this thing back in the air.
Wouldn't mess with the wing . Hard to believe it could be off . If you read through the thread you'll see they all are nose heavy . The CG should be at 3 3/4- 4" . How anyone could ever put a .46 on this and get it to balance is beyond me . This is a 60-90 airframe in my opinion . Move the battery behind the wing and the elevator servo to the tail and you should be good to go . Look at the pics in this thread . Lots of modifying going on on this bird . It does fly well when all said and done though .
Old 06-24-2010, 12:02 AM
  #1581  
JOHNS3D
Senior Member
My Feedback: (5)
 
JOHNS3D's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: mcallen, TX
Posts: 1,347
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: AeroWorks Edge 540T 46-60?

well after some thanks thru this 20cc engine, i can say is a really good choice for those who want to practice some 3D and freestyle, i ended with 15x8 APC propeller after testint 15x6, 15x4w, 14x4W, etc. with Xoar the engine will load  too much, at least 15x6, 15x8. Maybe a 16" will give me more punch, dont know. Today i tested finally the APC 15x8 and it really make a difference, it pulls the airplane really well, the speed was amazing, it will not hover the airplane too much time, but enough to practice a bit. Doing some rolling harriers makes me feel happy, enough fun to get back to my house relaxed lol. Did like 8 tanks today, just 2 with my 50cc Extra, too much wind.
Old 06-29-2010, 04:34 PM
  #1582  
N1EDM
My Feedback: (2)
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Brockton, MA
Posts: 4,290
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts
Default RE: AeroWorks Edge 540T 46-60?

I;ve got a spinner question...

I thought I would dress this model up with a nice 2-1/4" aluminum spinner, so I got Dave Brown Products to ship one, precut for a 14x6 prop hub. The engine is a Magnum .91 (OS-91 clone) 2S.

Unfortunately, not matter what combination I try, I cannot get the spinner, adapter nut and prop to fit... if I use a short adapter, it doesn't have enough thread to seat on the prop. If I use a long adapter, it's too long to let the 2-1/4" spinner to seat into its backplate.

What have you guys used for spinner/adapter nut combinations?

Thanks,

Bob
Old 06-29-2010, 05:10 PM
  #1583  
ro347
Senior Member
My Feedback: (13)
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Nutley, NJ
Posts: 2,322
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: AeroWorks Edge 540T 46-60?


ORIGINAL: N1EDM

I;ve got a spinner question...

I thought I would dress this model up with a nice 2-1/4'' aluminum spinner, so I got Dave Brown Products to ship one, precut for a 14x6 prop hub. The engine is a Magnum .91 (OS-91 clone) 2S.

Unfortunately, not matter what combination I try, I cannot get the spinner, adapter nut and prop to fit... if I use a short adapter, it doesn't have enough thread to seat on the prop. If I use a long adapter, it's too long to let the 2-1/4'' spinner to seat into its backplate.

What have you guys used for spinner/adapter nut combinations?

Thanks,

Bob
If im understanding what you are saying, possibly cut down your spinner bolt. I had to do this once before for some reason.
Old 06-29-2010, 07:49 PM
  #1584  
N1EDM
My Feedback: (2)
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Brockton, MA
Posts: 4,290
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts
Default RE: AeroWorks Edge 540T 46-60?

I'm afraid that if I do that, there won't be enough meat for the 10-32 screw to grab safely... but I'll keep that under advisement.

Was anyone able to get a 2-1/4" spinner onto this cowl with a .91 in it?

Bob
Old 06-29-2010, 11:05 PM
  #1585  
albsurfer
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Fallon, NV
Posts: 346
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: AeroWorks Edge 540T 46-60?


ORIGINAL: JOHNS3D

well after some thanks thru this 20cc engine, i can say is a really good choice for those who want to practice some 3D and freestyle, i ended with 15x8 APC propeller after testint 15x6, 15x4w, 14x4W, etc. with Xoar the engine will load too much, at least 15x6, 15x8. Maybe a 16'' will give me more punch, dont know. Today i tested finally the APC 15x8 and it really make a difference, it pulls the airplane really well, the speed was amazing, it will not hover the airplane too much time, but enough to practice a bit. Doing some rolling harriers makes me feel happy, enough fun to get back to my house relaxed lol. Did like 8 tanks today, just 2 with my 50cc Extra, too much wind.
JOHNS3D, how is your final weight using a 20cc?(Zenoah?) Isn't the plane heavy from that, thus affecting 3D and recovery ability? I would think, too, that the plane doesn't have much glide if it deadsticks.
Old 06-30-2010, 07:46 AM
  #1586  
DMyer
Senior Member
My Feedback: (2)
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Potomac, MD
Posts: 642
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: AeroWorks Edge 540T 46-60?


ORIGINAL: N1EDM

I'm afraid that if I do that, there won't be enough meat for the 10-32 screw to grab safely... but I'll keep that under advisement.

Was anyone able to get a 2-1/4'' spinner onto this cowl with a .91 in it?

Bob
I got the Tru-Turn ultimate spinner with the low pitch cutout.... worked perfect.


Dan
Old 07-03-2010, 07:56 PM
  #1587  
N1EDM
My Feedback: (2)
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Brockton, MA
Posts: 4,290
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts
Default RE: AeroWorks Edge 540T 46-60?

Thanks, Dan. I appreciate the lead/tip!

Bob
Old 07-04-2010, 11:58 PM
  #1588  
JOHNS3D
Senior Member
My Feedback: (5)
 
JOHNS3D's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: mcallen, TX
Posts: 1,347
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: AeroWorks Edge 540T 46-60?


ORIGINAL: albsurfer

JOHNS3D, how is your final weight using a 20cc?(Zenoah?) Isn't the plane heavy from that, thus affecting 3D and recovery ability? I would think, too, that the plane doesn't have much glide if it deadsticks.
well, after i tried different propellers i should say the 20cc rcgf is a good combo for this airplane, 3D ability is reall good, i can see it on my rolling harrier and harriers which doesnt give me troubles. Youhave to understand that most of the airplanes at low speed for 3D of course you will not have enough time to glide. But the weight on the airplane doenst make it hard to glide if you have enough speed, etc. like it normally does with any other nitro engine. Also the KE is better with this engine than my .81 alpha, which are one of the things that i love to make all the time with this airplane.
Old 07-06-2010, 08:36 AM
  #1589  
phatg0nk
Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: rising fawn, GA
Posts: 79
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: AeroWorks Edge 540T 46-60?

@johns3d Sounds fun with a little gasser on this, But what would be better saito100 4c or RCGF 20CC ..Ive never has a gasser and im not in a club but i have a nice place to fly, would setting a gasser up be difficult? Any insight would be appreciated. I may have got this plane a bit quick"not sure yet. Ive beeen flying a spad dogfighter and PTS hangar9 mustang . And a nexstar ..I do own G5 sim , which i put good hours in.
Old 07-06-2010, 10:04 AM
  #1590  
Revy
My Feedback: (1)
 
Revy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Revelstoke, BC, CANADA
Posts: 775
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default RE: AeroWorks Edge 540T 46-60?

You'll be fine with this plane. Awesome first precision aircraft! If you have the Saito, put it in. Easier to set-up, ie, like the way the manual wants you to.  When you have a handle on CG and flight characteristics then consider the gasser swap.

I miss mine!!! I'll get another one...winter 2010 project, no gas, hehehe.
Old 07-06-2010, 10:55 AM
  #1591  
phatg0nk
Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: rising fawn, GA
Posts: 79
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: AeroWorks Edge 540T 46-60?

thnx for the reply. I actually was wondering if i may would like the cheap out with a super tiger or thunder tiger 2 stroke.91 instead of the saito 100. Sorry i cant remember if its super tiger or thunder tiger atm , one of the 2 has a .91 2c for like 129 us dollars
Old 07-06-2010, 12:48 PM
  #1592  
albsurfer
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Fallon, NV
Posts: 346
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: AeroWorks Edge 540T 46-60?


ORIGINAL: phatg0nk

thnx for the reply. I actually was wondering if i may would like the cheap out with a super tiger or thunder tiger 2 stroke.91 instead of the saito 100. Sorry i cant remember if its super tiger or thunder tiger atm , one of the 2 has a .91 2c for like 129 us dollars
The Super Tigre .90 2S is 129.99. The Thunder Tiger .91 2S ( no muffler) is 182.00 at www.helikraft.com. the TT 1.20SE w/muffler is 190.40 there. Cheapest prices I've seen on these two.
The TT is a stronger/better engine & will turn a bigger/higher pitch prop.
Old 07-06-2010, 06:30 PM
  #1593  
phatg0nk
Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: rising fawn, GA
Posts: 79
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: AeroWorks Edge 540T 46-60?

If i was to buy a saito 100, for this edge 46-60 would i be able to mount the engine using existing blind nuts? do ineed to re drill, buy a certain mount?.Im sure theres many here that can answer this.. TY
Old 07-06-2010, 06:49 PM
  #1594  
phatg0nk
Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: rising fawn, GA
Posts: 79
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: AeroWorks Edge 540T 46-60?

One other thing , does any one know if Aeroworks sells replacment parts to this edge 540 40-60"so they call it"
Old 07-06-2010, 06:53 PM
  #1595  
ro347
Senior Member
My Feedback: (13)
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Nutley, NJ
Posts: 2,322
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: AeroWorks Edge 540T 46-60?


ORIGINAL: phatg0nk

One other thing , does any one know if Aeroworks sells replacment parts to this edge 540 40-60''so they call it''
Yes they do!
Old 07-07-2010, 11:50 AM
  #1596  
airborne2.4
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Freeport, BAHAMAS
Posts: 1,174
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: AeroWorks Edge 540T 46-60?


ORIGINAL: phatg0nk

If i was to buy a saito 100, for this edge 46-60 would i be able to mount the engine using existing blind nuts? do ineed to re drill, buy a certain mount?.Im sure theres many here that can answer this.. TY
Have a look at the reviews. I often ask Jimeni about a lot of things......he's always willing to help.

http://www.rcuniverse.com/product_gu...fm?kit_id=3862
Old 07-07-2010, 01:36 PM
  #1597  
ro347
Senior Member
My Feedback: (13)
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Nutley, NJ
Posts: 2,322
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: AeroWorks Edge 540T 46-60?


ORIGINAL: airborne2.4


ORIGINAL: phatg0nk

If i was to buy a saito 100, for this edge 46-60 would i be able to mount the engine using existing blind nuts? do ineed to re drill, buy a certain mount?.Im sure theres many here that can answer this.. TY
Have a look at the reviews. I often ask Jimeni about a lot of things......he's always willing to help.

http://www.rcuniverse.com/product_gu...fm?kit_id=3862
I chose not to use the original mount offered as it was very flimsy(in my opinion) for the saito 100. It would bend. I replaced it with the Dave Brown FS 90 mount. Worked really really well. Did have to redrill for new blind nuts, but is a simple process.
Old 07-08-2010, 04:25 PM
  #1598  
Wingman26
 
Wingman26's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Shawnee, OK
Posts: 102
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: AeroWorks Edge 540T 46-60?

I see where DLE is going to be releasing a 20 also, according to some people it might be available in August/September, might be a good match to this plane.
Old 07-08-2010, 05:26 PM
  #1599  
airborne2.4
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Freeport, BAHAMAS
Posts: 1,174
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: AeroWorks Edge 540T 46-60?


ORIGINAL: Wingman26

I see where DLE is going to be releasing a 20 also, according to some people it might be available in August/September, might be a good match to this plane.
DLE 20cc? Where did you see that?
Old 07-08-2010, 07:16 PM
  #1600  
phatg0nk
Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: rising fawn, GA
Posts: 79
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: AeroWorks Edge 540T 46-60?

yes , Ive actually heard that rumor as well, but i have never owned a gasser or 4c , im thinking of switching to gasser after using a saito for awhile


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.