Go Back  RCU Forums > RC Airplanes > 3D Flying!
Please vote if we should separate 3D/IMAC/Pattern! >

Please vote if we should separate 3D/IMAC/Pattern!

Community
Search
Notices
3D Flying! Our 3D flying forum is the ultimate resource for 3D flyers. Also discuss the latest in "4D" flying!

Please vote if we should separate 3D/IMAC/Pattern!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-04-2002 | 04:47 AM
  #1  
Thread Starter
Banned
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 14,189
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default Please vote if we should separate 3D/IMAC/Pattern!

Ok...we took a vote awhile back and it was split if I recall so that is why I did not do it...always good to recheck and see what you all want...SO

The proposal and vote here is if we should keep our 3D, Aerobatic and Pattern forum combined as it is now or separate into something like:

Main Forum: Aerobatics

Sub-forums
(3D)
(Imac)
(pattern)

All the posting would then be done in the 3D, Imac or pattern sub-forums.

Please vote and add any necessary comments and whatever you guys want is what your gonna get.
Old 12-04-2002 | 05:03 AM
  #2  
Flyfalcons's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 6,544
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
From: Bonney Lake, WA
Default Please vote if we should separate 3D/IMAC/Pattern!

I voted yes, but I feel that IMAC and Pattern could be put in the same forum, as trimming/flying technique discussions for precision flight would be beneficial for both groups.
Old 12-04-2002 | 05:36 AM
  #3  
Member
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 77
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Springfield, MO
Default Please vote if we should separate 3D/IMAC/Pattern!

I vote for the split. The stated forum with sub divisions would be fine. A division separating pattern and or precision flying from the 3d posts would be much appreciated.

Dan Curtis

Pattern Flyer
Old 12-04-2002 | 06:08 AM
  #4  
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 22
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Greenwood, SC
Default Please vote if we should separate 3D/IMAC/Pattern!

split the forums!
and ditto to the prior posts

Southerngent
Old 12-04-2002 | 06:10 AM
  #5  
Shortman's Avatar
My Feedback: (21)
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 5,966
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
From: Portland, Oregon
Default Please vote if we should separate 3D/IMAC/Pattern!

if i could vote i would say yes, time to split
Old 12-04-2002 | 08:02 AM
  #6  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 2,504
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
From: private, FRANCE
Default Please vote if we should separate 3D/IMAC/Pattern!

I would rather have F3A and AA together because it is pretty much the same guys, and the same equipment is used, like engines, airframes, etc.
Old 12-04-2002 | 01:54 PM
  #7  
Senior Member
My Feedback: (5)
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 1,070
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: sterling hts, MI
Default Please vote if we should separate 3D/IMAC/Pattern!

i say split it but put 3D and imac together. they are the same planes right?????
Old 12-04-2002 | 03:52 PM
  #8  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 207
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Jon Bon Jovi, CA,
Default split....

I think that we should split up "Aerobatics" into the subforums in the earlier posts...which are "3d", "Pattern/IMAC"

I think that IMAC is pattern....the only difference between IMAC/SCAT is the sequences...and the planes. So...I think that Pattern and IMAC should be together.\

Patrick
Old 12-04-2002 | 04:10 PM
  #9  
Senior Member
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 1,140
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Chester, UNITED KINGDOM
Default Please vote if we should separate 3D/IMAC/Pattern!

how bout 3D ..... then precision?
Old 12-04-2002 | 04:54 PM
  #10  
MHawker's Avatar
Senior Member
My Feedback: (16)
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 2,586
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: San Diego, CA
Default Please vote if we should separate 3D/IMAC/Pattern!

I, also, think the forums should be split into 3D and Pattern or Precision (good name!).

Mike
Old 12-04-2002 | 05:01 PM
  #11  
Senior Member
My Feedback: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 381
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Lebanon, OH
Default Please vote if we should separate 3D/IMAC/Pattern!

:thumbup:

3D / freestlye

IMAC / pattern (precision)

Hubb
Old 12-04-2002 | 07:16 PM
  #12  
Senior Member
My Feedback: (2)
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 312
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Cincinnati, OH
Default Please vote if we should separate 3D/IMAC/Pattern!

Howdy Hubb!

Gets my vote, too. Grouping IMAC and Pattern makes a lot of sense. 3D/Free/Artistic is certainly different and should be split apart.

Ken
Old 12-04-2002 | 07:59 PM
  #13  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 1,058
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
From: portland, OR,
Default Please vote if we should separate 3D/IMAC/Pattern!

You could split them, but why? If they were split, I would have to click three different sub-forums to get all the data I want. Do you really need to reduce the number of posts in any given sub-forum?

If you really want to re-arrange the sub-forums, I would delete 3D/Aerobatic/Pattern and delete Fun Fly/Profi and create:
*Pattern/F3A/AA/SPA/IMAC
*Sport Aerobatic/3D/Hot Dog/Fun fly

There will still be inevitable over-lap. Where do TOC discussions go?

IMHO
Old 12-04-2002 | 08:01 PM
  #14  
Texas 3D's Avatar
Senior Member
My Feedback: (16)
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 2,666
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Houston, TX
Default Please vote if we should separate 3D/IMAC/Pattern!

split split split !

The best way would be if you give us 3D flyer's our own forum and completely separated from the others. You either love 3D or you hate it. I love it, so I would like to see our own forum !
Old 12-04-2002 | 09:28 PM
  #15  
My Feedback: (16)
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 196
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: muncie, IN
Default Please vote if we should separate 3D/IMAC/Pattern!

Sure, it's easy to surf past the threads that are of no interest to me, but a separate forum devoted to IMAC, pattern, and 3D is very appealing to me.
While IMAC and pattern both fly a prescribed sequence of maneuvers, the other differences are very apparent.
Pattern folks are concerned about weight (11lb. limit), they do not gang servos, most use soft mounts of various designs, and use a wide variety of engines to haul their 2 meter airframes.
I would enjoy entering a discussion on pattern related threads.
IMAC was the way I got started into a "disciplined" style of flying, and I might have some experience of benefit to some to share on that forum.
3D is of no interest to me.....croz
Old 12-04-2002 | 11:43 PM
  #16  
Senior Member
My Feedback: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 381
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Lebanon, OH
Default Please vote if we should separate 3D/IMAC/Pattern!



I see most agree to split the forum, but now HOW do we split the forum??

maybe we need another vote :spinnyeye

Hubb
Old 12-05-2002 | 01:23 AM
  #17  
Thread Starter
Banned
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 14,189
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default Please vote if we should separate 3D/IMAC/Pattern!

Seems

3D
IMAC
Pattern

is a popular choice and all under the header "aerobatic"
Old 12-05-2002 | 02:21 AM
  #18  
Member
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 77
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Springfield, MO
Default Please vote if we should separate 3D/IMAC/Pattern!

Marc,

I would agree completely with those sub forums.

Pattern
Imac



3D

Dan
Old 12-05-2002 | 02:40 AM
  #19  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 1,185
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Drums, PA
Default Please vote if we should separate 3D/IMAC/Pattern!

I vote to split the categories BUT I'd like to see them listed as there own primary category instead of a SUB-category under one listing (Aerobatics say) This was what happened with the engines category and because of this the "Forum Jump" feature found on the bottom and/or top of a thread cannot be used as effeciently as you cannot jump right into the "giant engines" but rather have to click again once the screen loads with the sub-categories (engine disc, giant eng, twin and mutli cyl, rc fuels, tach readings, manufact. support).

Just my .02.............Mark
Old 12-05-2002 | 08:07 PM
  #20  
Thread Starter
Banned
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 14,189
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default Please vote if we should separate 3D/IMAC/Pattern!

so far the overwhelming majority who took the time to vote want the split.

I'm leaning towards the

Pattern
IMAC
3D


if we are in fact going to do this. While everyone won't agree on every way to break it up or if we should at all let's get something that will make the most people happy and the others hopefully happy as well as they get accustomed to it...nobody likes change but this one appears to have some logic to it.

Ideally I can make combo views where you can select to view multiple forums together but when posting you would have to decide which one to put it in.
Old 12-05-2002 | 09:43 PM
  #21  
Texas 3D's Avatar
Senior Member
My Feedback: (16)
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 2,666
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Houston, TX
Default Please vote if we should separate 3D/IMAC/Pattern!

I like this order better :

3D




Pattern
IMAC



Old 12-05-2002 | 10:28 PM
  #22  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 2,504
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
From: private, FRANCE
Default Please vote if we should separate 3D/IMAC/Pattern!

I'm still
Pattern/AA
3D
Imac.
Old 12-05-2002 | 10:43 PM
  #23  
Junior Member
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 24
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Alva, OK
Default Please vote if we should separate 3D/IMAC/Pattern!

For some of us on slow band. No chance of DSL or cable or anything fast it would be nice to have it all the same forum as is. I am interested in all pattern AA Imac freestyle 3D TOC. RCU has to many forums already.
Old 12-05-2002 | 11:13 PM
  #24  
Thread Starter
Banned
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 14,189
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default Please vote if we should separate 3D/IMAC/Pattern!

Ernies - this is a huge concern of mine...too many forums and overclassification is just as bad as underclassification. I think we have a bit too much but with all the topics it's difficult to cut them back...the elegant solution is the "custom" view.

A preview of what this will be is at this link:

http://www.rcuniverse.com/index.php?...bscribedonly=1

it will show ONLY those forums you are subscribed to on the homepage. Once I finish the forum manager module you can easily subscribe or unsubscribe to any forum on the site. Those selected forums will be the only ones that are searched (unless you specify otherwise), only ones to show on the homepage and only ones on the forumjump! This will cut the list down quite a bit for most making it more manageable.
Old 12-06-2002 | 02:00 AM
  #25  
Texas 3D's Avatar
Senior Member
My Feedback: (16)
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 2,666
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Houston, TX
Default Please vote if we should separate 3D/IMAC/Pattern!

Marc,
are we still going to be able to browse through all the forums freely, or would we have to subscribe to them in order to jump from one to another ? I have not understood why you would like to limit the forum jumping and searching


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.