Go Back  RCU Forums > RC Airplanes > 3D Flying!
Control Surface Area for 3D >

Control Surface Area for 3D

Community
Search
Notices
3D Flying! Our 3D flying forum is the ultimate resource for 3D flyers. Also discuss the latest in "4D" flying!

Control Surface Area for 3D

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-20-2002 | 09:23 PM
  #1  
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 19
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Charlotte, NC,
Default Control Surface Area for 3D

I thought this would be an interesting topic...not only that, I'm close to cutting out my elevators for my 1/4 Lanier Extra 300S. From a percentage standpoint, the plans call for approximately 30% of the horizontal stabilizer to be used as the elevator with no counterbalances. I am assuming this would be inadequate for 3D flying. Does anyone have any suggestions for control surface sizes for the average 1/4 scale plane?
Old 12-20-2002 | 09:24 PM
  #2  
Senior Member
My Feedback: (4)
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 6,378
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Bloomington, IL
Default Control Surface Area for 3D

Rougly 60/40.

60 elev
40 stab.
Old 12-20-2002 | 10:12 PM
  #3  
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 19
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Charlotte, NC,
Default Control Surface Area for 3D

In your opinion, what is a good percentage for the rudder?
Old 12-20-2002 | 10:27 PM
  #4  
Senior Member
My Feedback: (4)
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 6,378
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Bloomington, IL
Default Control Surface Area for 3D

Proably close to the same. 60/40. Rudder - fin.

How much do the plans call for?
Old 12-20-2002 | 10:43 PM
  #5  
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 19
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Charlotte, NC,
Default Control Surface Area for 3D

Plans show approximately 60% rudder/40% stabilizer, which includes the counterbalance. Visually, it appears as though the entire surface is cut down the center. By the way, thanks for your input!
Old 12-20-2002 | 10:50 PM
  #6  
Senior Member
My Feedback: (4)
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 6,378
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Bloomington, IL
Default Control Surface Area for 3D

Generally I would trust the designers. They pretty much know what people are going to be doing with their planes and design accordingly..
Old 12-20-2002 | 10:54 PM
  #7  
Senior Member
My Feedback: (5)
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 1,070
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: sterling hts, MI
Default Control Surface Area for 3D

grebner1......Im doing the same thing but on a small scale. Im doing it to a .40 300. The rudder was bearly 50/50 and the elevator was 75//25 stab/elev. Now the elevator is about 50/50 and the rudder is 25/75 fin/rudder. Its a little hard to see but look at the tail and tell me what you think.
Attached Thumbnails Click image for larger version

Name:	42074_15122.jpg
Views:	38
Size:	44.3 KB
ID:	26418  
Old 12-20-2002 | 10:55 PM
  #8  
Senior Member
My Feedback: (5)
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 1,070
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: sterling hts, MI
Default Control Surface Area for 3D

heres another.
Attached Thumbnails Click image for larger version

Name:	42075_15122.jpg
Views:	35
Size:	42.8 KB
ID:	26419  
Old 12-20-2002 | 10:56 PM
  #9  
Senior Member
My Feedback: (4)
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 6,378
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Bloomington, IL
Default Control Surface Area for 3D

Looks nice!

What motor for it?
Old 12-20-2002 | 10:59 PM
  #10  
Senior Member
My Feedback: (5)
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 1,070
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: sterling hts, MI
Default Control Surface Area for 3D

I am putting a os 50sx in there. I might try to put a tune pipe in it. Dont know yet. Plus i did abunch of stuff to get the wieght down. I dont think theres any thing in it stock. hehehe.
Old 12-20-2002 | 11:00 PM
  #11  
Senior Member
My Feedback: (5)
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 1,070
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: sterling hts, MI
Default Control Surface Area for 3D

click on the www on the bottom and you can see a lot more of it. Just go to ITS HERE.
Old 12-20-2002 | 11:01 PM
  #12  
Senior Member
My Feedback: (4)
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 6,378
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Bloomington, IL
Default Control Surface Area for 3D

Is it the GP .40 sized?
I had one. Nice plane.
Old 12-20-2002 | 11:05 PM
  #13  
Senior Member
My Feedback: (4)
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 6,378
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Bloomington, IL
Default Control Surface Area for 3D

Originally posted by da king
click on the www on the bottom and you can see a lot more of it. Just go to ITS HERE.
I did.

Very nice.
Whats it going to be covered like?
Old 12-20-2002 | 11:06 PM
  #14  
Senior Member
My Feedback: (5)
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 1,070
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: sterling hts, MI
Default Control Surface Area for 3D

ya thats the gp. Cant wait to see how it does with the sx tail on it. I didnt change the ail at all. If it flys real good that i will have to make a new wing. I made the wing diffrent that the kit. Cut my own ribs and used 1/4 x 1/8 spruce spars. The wing is REAL light. Still trying to get some more wieght out of the fuse.
Old 12-20-2002 | 11:07 PM
  #15  
Senior Member
My Feedback: (5)
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 1,070
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: sterling hts, MI
Default Control Surface Area for 3D

I still dont have a scheme. Im lousy at thinking up scheme's. Got any idea's?????????
Old 12-20-2002 | 11:25 PM
  #16  
Senior Member
My Feedback: (4)
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 6,378
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Bloomington, IL
Default Control Surface Area for 3D

I was trying to find a pic of mine. I dont know what I did with it. If I find it I will post it.
Old 12-21-2002 | 01:19 AM
  #17  
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 19
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Charlotte, NC,
Default Control Surface Area for 3D

I had one too and built it stock except for replacing the built up elevators for solid. I ran a saito .80 4c and didn't take ANY additional measures to lighten, so I ended up with a squirly, overpowered plane. I covered mine just as Great Planes did on the cover of the box using monokote for everything. I printed stars from my pc and laminated them onto red monokote, cut them out, and applied. I did the same with the blue stripes running the span of the wing, stab, and fuse. I prefer regular monokote over decals and adhesive-backed colors because it (in my opinion) is much more permanent. I've never had a problem with my trim delaminating. Boy, did I love that plane!

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are On



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.