Go Back  RCU Forums > RC Airplanes > 3D Flying!
 prop rpm question?? >

prop rpm question??

Community
Search
Notices
3D Flying! Our 3D flying forum is the ultimate resource for 3D flyers. Also discuss the latest in "4D" flying!

prop rpm question??

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-29-2009 | 07:47 PM
  #1  
Thread Starter
Senior Member
My Feedback: (13)
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 2,322
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Nutley, NJ
Default prop rpm question??

Lets just say....

If im able to get 8400 rpm using a 15x6 prop, and 9500 rpm using a 14x6 prop.... for say the same amount of thrust - Which prop would be better for 3D?
Old 10-29-2009 | 09:06 PM
  #2  
 
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: St. Cloud, MN
Default RE: prop rpm question??

well, IF they are the same thrust the 15" would be a better choice. It will give you a little more control during high alpha/stalled manuevers. This is because it has a tad more air over the ailerons and stab.....However, I would be willing to guess that the 14 x 6 is actually giving you a tad more thrust. I'm guessing the extra 1,100 rpm will outweigh the extra 1" of prop. But it all depends on which engine/plane/weight combo.
Old 10-29-2009 | 09:46 PM
  #3  
Thread Starter
Senior Member
My Feedback: (13)
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 2,322
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Nutley, NJ
Default RE: prop rpm question??

Saito 91 on showtime 50 at about 6.5lbs.

Wondering if static thrust is equal...or just about.... is there a benefit to the higher rpm range?

So far ive run:

an apc 14x7 at 9000 rpm(calculated 9.77 lbs of thrust) ,,,

and 15x6 xoar at 8400 rpm(calculated 11.22 lbs of thrust)


also wondering if i should be looking for higher peak rpm - am i putting too much load on engine with 15x6?
Old 10-29-2009 | 10:06 PM
  #4  
j.duncker's Avatar
My Feedback: (2)
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 4,045
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
From: Sailing in the Eastern Caribbean
Default RE: prop rpm question??

I fly a lot of 3D and I like to have my engines revving on light props. Why, I want a faster spool up time. You rarely use full throttle except on pull outs and the odd vertical manouvre but you want that engine running at or near peak torque.

Try a 15 x6 Zinger or a APC 16 x 4 wide. Maybe even a 15 x 4 Zinger.
Old 10-29-2009 | 10:35 PM
  #5  
MetallicaJunkie's Avatar
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 5,464
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
From: Donna, TX
Default RE: prop rpm question??

try 15x4 apc if you wanna 3d your ST or 15x6 wood .... that 14x7 would make a decent imac type prop for some speed
Old 10-29-2009 | 10:42 PM
  #6  
Thread Starter
Senior Member
My Feedback: (13)
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 2,322
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Nutley, NJ
Default RE: prop rpm question??


ORIGINAL: MetallicaJunkie

try 15x4 apc if you wanna 3d your ST or 15x6 wood .... that 14x7 would make a decent imac type prop for some speed
the 14x7 was excellent for more pattern type flying-used it for 2 seasons. But after trying a Xoar 15x6...all I can say is WOW!!!! What took me so long! Ive flown a 15x4 apc before...I honestly didnt like it. It was just too slow. Maybe I should give it another shot. Im guessing everything is a little easier when its slower.
Old 10-29-2009 | 11:01 PM
  #7  
MetallicaJunkie's Avatar
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 5,464
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
From: Donna, TX
Default RE: prop rpm question??

maybe you should keep the 15x6 xoar....even though it is not on the "reccomended" props list........... you cant go smaller or else you'll have to increase your pitch, and you cant go bigger than 15 ....now that you have discovered the wood 15x6 are best now its time to experiment with different brands.....performance is what you want so dont even try a power point or zinger..........
Old 10-29-2009 | 11:08 PM
  #8  
Thread Starter
Senior Member
My Feedback: (13)
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 2,322
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Nutley, NJ
Default RE: prop rpm question??


ORIGINAL: MetallicaJunkie

maybe you should keep the 15x6 xoar....even though it is not on the ''reccomended'' props list........... you cant go smaller or else you'll have to increase your pitch, and you cant go bigger than 15 ....now that you have discovered the wood 15x6 are best now its time to experiment with different brands.....performance is what you want so dont even try a power point or zinger..........
So back to the original question...if i stay at 15 im at 8400 rpm..... if i go lower to 14.... I would gain in rpm. Now LETS say im able to achieve enough rpm with a 14 to have same amount of thrust..... whats better low rpm or higher at equal thrust? Im guessing higher.
Old 10-29-2009 | 11:19 PM
  #9  
JOHNS3D's Avatar
Senior Member
My Feedback: (5)
 
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 1,347
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: mcallen, TX
Default RE: prop rpm question??

i would go with 14x4W
Old 10-30-2009 | 12:34 AM
  #10  
Senior Member
My Feedback: (17)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 3,931
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Idaho Falls, ID
Default RE: prop rpm question??

My take on this is:

IF and I mean IFF! the thrust was exactly the same on both props and the lower RPM didn't overheat the engine I'd go with the lower RPM. My reasoning would be a larger airflow for one and the second and more important would be that the "feeling" of quicker spool up would be with the slower RPM. It takes less time to get to a lower RPM than a higher one. Also the larger prop would probably give more thrust earlier in the RPM range thus quicker pull out.

Thanks
Barry
Old 10-30-2009 | 08:30 AM
  #11  
Senior Member
My Feedback: (17)
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 983
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Ewa, HI
Default RE: prop rpm question??


ORIGINAL: ro347


ORIGINAL: MetallicaJunkie

maybe you should keep the 15x6 xoar....even though it is not on the ''reccomended'' props list........... you cant go smaller or else you'll have to increase your pitch, and you cant go bigger than 15 ....now that you have discovered the wood 15x6 are best now its time to experiment with different brands.....performance is what you want so dont even try a power point or zinger..........
So back to the original question...if i stay at 15 im at 8400 rpm..... if i go lower to 14.... I would gain in rpm. Now LETS say im able to achieve enough rpm with a 14 to have same amount of thrust..... whats better low rpm or higher at equal thrust? Im guessing higher.
Personally I would go for the bigger diameter over higher RPMs. The bigger the diameter of the prop the more air is moving the control surfaces to control the plane. Go with a light wood prop to make up for some RPMs and make spool uo speed quicker and also have less torque roll. Or another option is throw that monster 91 on the Pro Yak.
Old 10-30-2009 | 11:14 AM
  #12  
daveopam's Avatar
My Feedback: (9)
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 7,810
Received 43 Likes on 38 Posts
From: ELK CITY, OK
Default RE: prop rpm question??

Of those two props, I would use the shorter one. The throttle response should be better for 3D. I would personally not use either one and go to a 15x4W. But that may just be me.

david
Old 10-30-2009 | 11:51 AM
  #13  
Thread Starter
Senior Member
My Feedback: (13)
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 2,322
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Nutley, NJ
Default RE: prop rpm question??


[quote]ORIGINAL: beachbrada


[quote]ORIGINAL: ro347


ORIGINAL: MetallicaJunkie

Or another option is throw that monster 91 on the Pro Yak.
LOL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Old 10-30-2009 | 04:51 PM
  #14  
KWJ48's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 479
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Midlothian, VA
Default RE: prop rpm question??

I think you're comparing apples to oranges- apc = plastic/ heavier to xoar = wood/lighter.. If you and your motor like the spool up of wood then stick with it. I would compare wood to wood. Try some [link=http://www.vesspropellers.com/servlet/the-Sport-Series-Props/Categories]Vess[/link] props. I run 6 pitch props on 4 strokes because they torque up more than 2 strokers. If you want a durable prop look at [link=http://www3.towerhobbies.com/cgi-bin/wti0001p?&I=LXZ981&P=SM]MAS K[/link] or my favorite has been [link=http://www3.towerhobbies.com/cgi-bin/wti0001p?&I=LXNGU4&P=SM]MAS S2[/link] lately. I run 14x6s on my saito 91. It's your decision though.
Old 10-30-2009 | 06:35 PM
  #15  
Jezmo's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 2,132
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
From: Spring, TX
Default RE: prop rpm question??

I have my Saito 91 on an AeroWorks Extra 260 weighing 6.5 lbs. The APC 15X4W pulls good but the spool-up is so slooooow that it is hard to get a stable hover. The woods, 14X6 MA Scimitar is pretty good but the XOAR is better, give a much much much faster spool-up and make for a much easier hover. Go to Paul Swanny's website (google it) and he highly recommends the XOAR props. He also makes one of the best 3D profiles on the planet (Mojo). I have yet to find anything that works better on my 50cc Extra than XOAR.
Old 10-31-2009 | 02:38 PM
  #16  
Thread Starter
Senior Member
My Feedback: (13)
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 2,322
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Nutley, NJ
Default RE: prop rpm question??


ORIGINAL: Jezmo

I have my Saito 91 on an AeroWorks Extra 260 weighing 6.5 lbs. The APC 15X4W pulls good but the spool-up is so slooooow that it is hard to get a stable hover. The woods, 14X6 MA Scimitar is pretty good but the XOAR is better, give a much much much faster spool-up and make for a much easier hover. Go to Paul Swanny's website (google it) and he highly recommends the XOAR props. He also makes one of the best 3D profiles on the planet (Mojo). I have yet to find anything that works better on my 50cc Extra than XOAR.
How do you like that Extra with the .91? You think it needs more?
Old 10-31-2009 | 03:45 PM
  #17  
Jezmo's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 2,132
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
From: Spring, TX
Default RE: prop rpm question??

Yes sir, I do. It will hover and also will pull out but the pull-out is sooo sloooow that most times I just rock it over and fly it out. Don't get me wrong, the old 91 has treated me well and it's still strong considering it's 11 or 12 yrs old but the 260 is roughly 6.5 lbs and that's just a wee bit much for a 91 to hover. The 100 at only 1 more oz would be a better choice if one is buying an engine for this plane. If you already have the 91 like I did it will get the job done but that's about it. I know one fellow in my neck of the woods that runs a Saito 125 on his and likes it a bunch. I think the 125 is only like 2 or 3 oz heavier but I don't know that for sure. Good luck with yours.
Old 10-31-2009 | 09:54 PM
  #18  
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 507
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Rapid City, SD
Default RE: prop rpm question??

Hey ro347 every body's flying style is different. When I finish a new plane engine combo .I go test fly the plane after the first two or three flights and have the plane flying the way I want, CG, and control throws then The next day out, I will grab 7 or 8 props, a variety of wood and composite props with different Pitches and dia. and keep flying and changing the props until I find the perfect prop for my flying style. I know your like the rest of us and have a 5 gallon bucket of props LOL!!! The Higher altitudes that we fly compared to the lower alt. you fly, requires we have at least 20% more power due to density alt. and our naturally aspirated engines to make the plane fly the same. At the higher alt. we loose out due to the lighter air causing lose of lift and power.
jerrysu29 Call Sign Wild Man

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are On



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.