Go Back  RCU Forums > RC Airplanes > 3D Flying!
 what is better >

what is better

Community
Search
Notices
3D Flying! Our 3D flying forum is the ultimate resource for 3D flyers. Also discuss the latest in "4D" flying!

what is better

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-07-2009 | 08:56 PM
  #1  
Thread Starter
Senior Member
My Feedback: (1)
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 501
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: mt.pleasant, PA
Default what is better

what is better for 3D and free stile aerobatics? a flatter pitch prop or one with high pitch ? or is diameter better?
Old 11-07-2009 | 09:12 PM
  #2  
JOHNS3D's Avatar
Senior Member
My Feedback: (5)
 
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 1,347
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: mcallen, TX
Default RE: what is better

hu?, it depends, engine, size, airplane, etc..... for example on my .81 alpha engine on my Edge i use 14x4W(wide) and it makes good hovers, etc. On my 50cc gasser, i use 22x8 and work perfect. Most of the sport flyers use 7, 8, 10 pitch and 6 or 4 for 3D but as i said depends of the size of the propeller, engine, etc.
Old 11-07-2009 | 10:21 PM
  #3  
Thread Starter
Senior Member
My Feedback: (1)
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 501
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: mt.pleasant, PA
Default RE: what is better

ok let me narow it down I have an RCS 140 on a 2m type free style weighing 12lb. need more vertical i am currently useing a 16x8 APC
Old 11-07-2009 | 10:48 PM
  #4  
My Feedback: (12)
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 339
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
From: Murray, KY
Default RE: what is better

As a general rule for good 3D performance - vertical performance you want to use the lowest pitch-largest diameter prop your engine will handle. If your running a 16x8 then try a 18x6 prop.
It will give you a slower top speed , but will give better vertical performance. Also try to use a light prop like wood not composite like APC.
Old 11-07-2009 | 11:46 PM
  #5  
Thread Starter
Senior Member
My Feedback: (1)
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 501
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: mt.pleasant, PA
Default RE: what is better

That is what i am leaning toward I have a wood 18x6 master airscrew that i am going to try tomorrow the plane is a model tec remedy a 2m freestyle pattern plane it needs better vertical
Old 11-08-2009 | 03:13 AM
  #6  
MetallicaJunkie's Avatar
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 5,464
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
From: Donna, TX
Default RE: what is better

on gassers the lowest is about an 8 pitch.... on glows the lowest is about 4
Old 11-08-2009 | 06:21 AM
  #7  
My Feedback: (13)
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 1,462
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: berlin hts, OH
Default RE: what is better

for the gasser's i use the vess A series when i need more vertical.they seem to be like a 6 pitch prop with less speed,but more pull. and i have not been able to find any other prop in a 6 pitch for gasser's.
Old 11-08-2009 | 10:49 AM
  #8  
Walt and Sage's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 817
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Ellensburg, WA
Default RE: what is better

A Vess 23xA works GREAT on a 50cc gas motors for more pull ...
Old 11-08-2009 | 05:39 PM
  #9  
Senior Member
My Feedback: (1)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 3,775
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: surrey, BC, CANADA
Default RE: what is better


ORIGINAL: go vertical

That is what i am leaning toward I have a wood 18x6 master airscrew that i am going to try tomorrow the plane is a model tec remedy a 2m freestyle pattern plane it needs better vertical
I think the APC will have more thrust..if the RCS can swing an 18x6W APC,you should be able to have unlimited vertical and be able to hover a 12 pounder.
Old 11-08-2009 | 06:22 PM
  #10  
Thread Starter
Senior Member
My Feedback: (1)
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 501
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: mt.pleasant, PA
Default RE: what is better

well i tryed the 18x6 today, not good at all it didn't like it at all . tuned the engine in a little better got 8,600rpm on the 16x8 the plane preformed better but still is poor in the vertical just flat runs out after a 200 foot clime
Old 11-08-2009 | 08:07 PM
  #11  
Eganwp's Avatar
My Feedback: (1)
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 759
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Calgary, AB, CANADA
Default RE: what is better

Try reducing some weight in that plane first. A123's/cf lg/lighter wheels/lighter nose cone/lose pilot figure/cf wing tube/remove ballast and move equipment around/smaller tank/etc.
Old 11-08-2009 | 10:14 PM
  #12  
Thread Starter
Senior Member
My Feedback: (1)
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 501
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: mt.pleasant, PA
Default RE: what is better

that for the most part has been done the plane is the plane now i am looking for the most efishent prop
Old 11-09-2009 | 05:58 PM
  #13  
KWJ48's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 479
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Midlothian, VA
Default RE: what is better

Maybe you need more engine?
Old 11-09-2009 | 06:15 PM
  #14  
MetallicaJunkie's Avatar
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 5,464
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
From: Donna, TX
Default RE: what is better


ORIGINAL: go vertical

well i tryed the 18x6 today, not good at all it didn't like it at all . tuned the engine in a little better got 8,600rpm on the 16x8 the plane preformed better but still is poor in the vertical just flat runs out after a 200 foot clime

try an apc 17x6 you'll love it
Old 11-10-2009 | 12:58 AM
  #15  
Senior Member
My Feedback: (1)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 3,775
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: surrey, BC, CANADA
Default RE: what is better

I thought an RCS140 would have more balls than that. Cant haul a 12 pounder up a short hill? maybe it needs to be tuned better? maybe the 17x6 APC is better. My YS 140 and OS 160 will turn the APC 18x6W with ease and pull around 18 pounds thrust..12 pounds is nothing for them.
Old 11-10-2009 | 12:22 PM
  #16  
Thread Starter
Senior Member
My Feedback: (1)
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 501
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: mt.pleasant, PA
Default RE: what is better

I had this engine on a ultra stick light it weighed 10 1/2 lb. vertical was very good even put the plane on floats wich brout the weight up to 12 lb. it still preformed good that is why i felt ok with puting it in the remedy. i have a 17x6 on order i will try it as soon as i can
Old 11-16-2009 | 02:52 PM
  #17  
Thread Starter
Senior Member
My Feedback: (1)
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 501
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: mt.pleasant, PA
Default RE: what is better

OK the 17x6 was a good improvement
Old 11-16-2009 | 03:27 PM
  #18  
MetallicaJunkie's Avatar
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 5,464
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
From: Donna, TX
Default RE: what is better


ORIGINAL: go vertical

OK the 17x6 was a good improvement

great....how many rpm's was it turning?
Old 11-16-2009 | 09:48 PM
  #19  
Thread Starter
Senior Member
My Feedback: (1)
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 501
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: mt.pleasant, PA
Default RE: what is better

I didn't get a reading but there is a good improvement in the over all flying .

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are On



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.