RCU Forums

RCU Forums (https://www.rcuniverse.com/forum/)
-   3D Flying! (https://www.rcuniverse.com/forum/3d-flying-82/)
-   -   U Can Do 3D (https://www.rcuniverse.com/forum/3d-flying-82/226620-u-can-do-3d.html)

Maudib 05-08-2003 12:23 PM

U Can Do FOr Sale on the Sale Forum
 
Just wanted to let you guys know I've put my UcanDo3D up for sale..

After flying my Edge, I just gotta have more of them big dogs...

See the thread here:

My UC3D for sale post]

eness76-RCU 05-08-2003 12:23 PM

Unpopular opinion
 
I guess I'll speak up for those of us who would rather go digital on the UCD. I've flown it both ways, and it was much more crisp to control inputs on the digitals. You can get into the 5625-45 for little more than the price of a Futaba or JR high torque servo, and you get 5 times the holding power from the digital. I find that a little more confidence inspiring on say the back side of a KE loop. Everybody has their own opinion though, but this has been my experience with it.

Maudib 05-08-2003 12:31 PM

Re: Unpopular opinion
 
Hey Columbus guy... I'm in Hebron, and fly in Newark... ;)

Good thoughts on the subject, I think what people ought to take from this thread is that this plane WILL fly great with standard servos... and maybe a Hi Torque on the tail...

But they might get better performance from Digitals...

Bottom line is the plane doesn't REQUIRE them, and when I say that I mean... to fly well, strong, aerobatic, etc... and I don't think anyone would be dissapointed in a more basic setup...

And if the budget is no issue (5645's are $56... 425bb's are $14 and 605bb's are $30) then I'm sure one WOULD enjoy faster response, more authority, etc....




Originally posted by eness76
I guess I'll speak up for those of us who would rather go digital on the UCD. I've flown it both ways, and it was much more crisp to control inputs on the digitals. You can get into the 5625-45 for little more than the price of a Futaba or JR high torque servo, and you get 5 times the holding power from the digital. I find that a little more confidence inspiring on say the back side of a KE loop. Everybody has their own opinion though, but this has been my experience with it.

sensei 05-08-2003 12:33 PM

U Can Do 3D
 
Very well stated!
Bob

FalconWings10 05-09-2003 12:00 AM

Just Trying to Help
 
I was just trying to help out those on a lesser budget or might be steered away from buying and having as much fun with their UCD as I have had. P.S. While you guys are putting the extra $$$ in the U-Can-Do, I'll be putting the extra in my Carden. You can stand in the pits and watch.

krayzc-RCU 05-09-2003 12:13 AM

U Can Do 3D
 
were r u located as i would love to watch!!!!

beerman 05-09-2003 12:42 AM

Saito 100
 
Are y'all reversing the carb on the Saito 100 (inverted mounting) or relocating the throttle pushrod? I guess it doesn't matter either way, just curious.

FalconWings10 05-09-2003 01:52 AM

U Can Do 3D
 
Sorry for the last comment guys. Just a bad day.

eness76-RCU 05-09-2003 12:36 PM

just an opinion
 
hey I didn't mean anything elitist or anything like that. I know alot of guys like the Futaba and JR high torque servos, I'm personally a fan of JR myself. But on something like the UCD, my point was that you could spend a few extra bucks and get the extra holding power (5x) of the cored digital by Hitec, which I'm also a big fan of. For 50 dollars, you can't beat the holding power of these servos, and holding power is required for walls, KE loops, Blenders, and any power on spins where propblast is really working the surface. I wholeheartedly agree that these aren't required, but I've flown them both ways, and my preference is the more solid feel of the digital, there is a difference. I just thought I'd add my input as someone reviewing this thread for setup info may find what I have to say of value, after all, I do have 21 years of RC Experience with a majority of those years spent in the pattern arena.
Hey Mordib, I fly at the Delaware Model Airplane Club, just north of the city.

FalconWings10 05-09-2003 12:38 PM

U Can Do 3D
 
Yes eness76, I agree with you.

=XGC= OzZ 05-10-2003 11:00 AM

Hi all question.
 
Ok I am going to get the ys 110.
OK here is the question, what prop would be good?
Thanks..
And what is a good prop balancer for big props ..
I am ordering everything this week for the U-Can-Do, exccept the engine...

June 1 it looks like........ :p

=XGC= OzZ 05-11-2003 12:03 PM

Steve how is this holding up?
 

Originally posted by Steve Campbell
<<The stock tailwheel is fine...>>

Until it breaks, or is ripped out by side torsion on a bad landing.

Two of the four flying here have had both things occur.

If every landing is a good one, yes, it is fine.

But this airplane encourages one to 'push the envelope' and try new things; like dragging it along on the prop just above the runway ("high-alpha" flight). The model flies so slowly that you become mesmerized and it gets away from you, and the next you know it has slammed onto it's landing gear. Is that the model's fault? Of course not. But reality sucks, sometimes.

Moral of the story; it is a quick and inexpensive modification to put an easily-replaceable tail wheel unit on the UCD. That "skid" area just in front of the rudder is solid balsa. If you cut a quarter inch or so off, fabricate and install a plywood plate to serve as a base you can screw solidly into, and recover with scraps of MonoKote, you now have a solid platform to firmly attach the after-market tail wheel unit of your choice.

You don't even have to trim down the existing area; my pal just glued a five-ply plate in place and bolted a Sulivan unit right on.

Below is a pic of how I did it; a bit more work, but more aesthetically pleasing, if that sort of thing matters to you. If you look close, you can see where the left rear corner of my plywood plate doesn't quite match up to the tail post of the fuselage, as well as the seams of the scrap MonoKote I covered it with. My primary reason for cutting the "skid" down was to maintain prop clearance; that 16x4W is huge. My pal has no clearance problem on his, but the model does sit quite a bit higher in the rear.

Whatever. If you land the airplane "vigorously" the issue tail wheel unit is not long for this world. YMMV...

Steve

???????

http://www.rcuniverse.com/attachment...&postid=801432

LSP972 05-11-2003 12:52 PM

U Can Do 3D
 
The installation is holding up fine. However, the tail wheel unit is getting rather loose and sloppy in the plastic bearing/mount; to the point that it is canted a bit when the tail is on the ground, necessitating holding considerable rudder to make the airplane track straight.

Bending the wheel/strut doesn't help, since the wheel is at an angle to the ground.

This is not a big deal- yet- but the Sullivan unit appears to be made rather cheaply. The beauty of this arrangement, however, is that when it becomes objectionable, it is a five minute job to replace the unit.

You will end up doing some variation of this eventually, since the stock unit WILL fail. It is just a question of how soon...

Steve

=XGC= OzZ 05-11-2003 02:08 PM

This is true..
 

Originally posted by Steve Campbell
The installation is holding up fine. However, the tail wheel unit is getting rather loose and sloppy in the plastic bearing/mount; to the point that it is canted a bit when the tail is on the ground, necessitating holding considerable rudder to make the airplane track straight.

Bending the wheel/strut doesn't help, since the wheel is at an angle to the ground.

This is not a big deal- yet- but the Sullivan unit appears to be made rather cheaply. The beauty of this arrangement, however, is that when it becomes objectionable, it is a five minute job to replace the unit.

You will end up doing some variation of this eventually, since the stock unit WILL fail. It is just a question of how soon...

Steve

Its really that bad the stock landing gear?
What is thw web link to that tail gear?
Thanks for your time on this Steve.. :D

loveflyn 05-11-2003 04:49 PM

16 X 4W APC prop on YS 91 UCD 3D
 
I was going to try the 16 X 4W APC prop on my YS 91 and my Tru Turn spinner adaptor bottomed out way before the prop hub. Any one else experience this and have a clean solution? Am using a 15 X 7 which flies the plane ok but can't get the rpms desired.

LSP972 05-11-2003 05:29 PM

U Can Do 3D
 
The "W" APC props are not as thick as the "regular" ones, in the hub area. That may be why your adapter is bottoming out.

Another reason why I put a five-dollar DuBro spinner on mine. Sure, they're all spiffy and trendy, but I cannot see spending the equivalent of a case of fuel on a prop spinner... different priorities, I guess.

Steve

LSP972 05-11-2003 05:33 PM

U Can Do 3D
 
<<...Is it really that bad (the stock gear)...>>

Depends upon one's definition of "bad". It works, and if the airplane is handled gently (no hard landings) it will last a long time. But it transmits all the ground loads into the servo, plus same for the hinges. One good thump will tear it out.

You pays your money, and you makes your choice...

=XGC= OzZ 05-12-2003 08:49 AM

Re: 16 X 4W APC prop on YS 91 UCD 3D
 

Originally posted by loveflyn
I was going to try the 16 X 4W APC prop on my YS 91 and my Tru Turn spinner adaptor bottomed out way before the prop hub. Any one else experience this and have a clean solution? Am using a 15 X 7 which flies the plane ok but can't get the rpms desired.
Check out the review on the UCD
It has a True Turn on it I think..
RCADMIN has it on his.. :D

loveflyn 05-12-2003 03:33 PM

U Can Do 3D
 
I checked out rc universe review of the UCD and he has a tru turn all right but is using the 15 X 6 prop so it doesn't answer the question. I have emailed tru turn with the porblem and await their answer. Will post it if interested as this has probably come up or will come up again. I would like to find an aliminum washer or spacer with the right id and od so as not to ad weight to the nose. That would be one solution. The other is to go back to the "Rudolf the red nose spinner" that came with the arf and put the 16 X 4W on with the stock YS 91 washer and nut and hope there is enough thread.

eness76-RCU 05-12-2003 03:35 PM

U Can Do 3D
 
can you put the stock ys washer and nut on it, and then put the TruTurn adapter on top of that? I'm not familiar with what comes with the YS.

stevezero 05-12-2003 03:36 PM

U Can Do 3D
 
Just do what I did and put a dubro prop nut on it. I use a Higley flat nut as well, so its double nutted. I do have enough room for a second higley nut, if it tries to work itself loose. You cut out so much of the plastic spinner that it is liable to break on either startup, or inflight stress.

Steve

=XGC= OzZ 05-15-2003 06:37 PM

Hey is this good?
 
YS 110 Shipped for 310.00? :confused:

stomper 05-15-2003 08:06 PM

U Can Do 3D
 

YS 110 Shipped for 310.00?
Who is offering the 110 for $310.00? And yes thats a good price!

Doug

=XGC= OzZ 05-15-2003 08:08 PM

If its true I will let you know,,,,
 

Originally posted by stomper
Who is offering the 110 for $310.00? And yes thats a good price!

Doug

:D

=XGC= OzZ 05-16-2003 02:20 AM

Well Like they say
 
If it sounds to good.. It is...
Just a we bit more,,,,,,,
$380.00


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:16 PM.


Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.