RCU Forums - View Single Post - another 2 stroke vs. 4 stroke thread
View Single Post
Old 05-14-2006 | 08:47 PM
  #12  
blw's Avatar
blw
My Feedback: (3)
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 9,449
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
From: Opelika, AL
Default RE: another 2 stroke vs. 4 stroke thread

I fly both for sport and pattern. This 2 stroke is better thing makes absolutely no sense. I know that if I want smooth power to pull a vertical the 4 stroke delivers without waiting like a 2 stroke to reach speeds and the power band. Also, a lot of things are better if you have torque available immediately and without the high RPMs all the time. You can fly smoother with a 4 stroke unless you have a really overpowered engine that will pull a plane around *smoothly* at 7000-8000 RPM.

One thing nobody has mentioned is that you can have a lighter plane if you have a 4 stroke since you don't need to carry around a lot of fuel. How many 2 stroke planes can fly around for 12 minutes on a 5 oz tank? Not many.

If you are hyped up about wiping a plane down at the end of a day, 2 and 4 strokes alike, just use some polymer based wax on the covering and it comes off in one swipe. And, the plane looks better too.

Who cares about noise? I like loud planes! Too many people whine about noise.

edited for spelling