If these rams were such garbage, then why did we allways here they were the best? Why did so many people try so hard to let everyone know Rams were GREAT. How many times on a public forum like this did we hear "Rams are the best" "I got humpting jillion flights on my Bandit with my Ram 1000" "Never misses a beat" "Flawless". Was this a big fat lie? So many people were on the Ram bandwagon that are coming out now with these stories. Peoples favorite line has always been" go to the shows, see what people are flying and what they are having success with" A year and a half ago and earlier, it was all Rams. Now you go to a show and its practically all JC. I cant really tell any difference. It seems to me all the same people that said rams were the best are now saying they are crap and now JC is the best. Did people advertise Rams knowing they had problems? How did people manage 200 plus flight on several airframe on such low quality turbines?
If people were silent about problems then, then how do we know if peolpe are just being silent know?
I for one had very few problems with my Rams. I'm starting to sound like the lone ranger these days when I say that. I own 2 rams, 2 JC and 1 Simjet. I even had a 500 that ran awesome. Maybe I'm just lucky. I can say one thing. I never had a flameout on any of my RAMS. I have replaced some questionable parts on my RAMS, but not because they failed. Just preventative.
Scott Marr