clearly there should be some For Profit company jumping on the Eflight/PF market- If the AMA sells $10 insurance for $58, what's wrong with a insurance company selling $10 insurance for $20 to the E/PFs... even if we claim the new company cant get the coverage for $10 like ama, even if they get it for $20 or $25 there is plenty of room for markup and stay well below the AMA 58.

This new insurance co could contact the municipalities that grant fields to AMA, and show the same insurance coverage with similar safety rules... and demand equal access to the public lands granted to ama clubs, or get the competative bid going to get exclusive use of public land.

or is ama club monoplolizing said public lands and will fight Co-Use or Competition To Use those public lands- such as the regional parks in the San Fransico bay area?