Indeed. This is why it is quite pointless comparing fuel burns of jet engines when the airframes are different. Mine is nearly twice that of Dave Johnson's big Vulcan because he is, on average, using lower power settings reverting to full power for those big climbing turns and gliding at low power thereafter.
Remember, too, that wing-loading is a factor; I have 45 sqft, Dave has something like 70sqft. Take-off weight of the Hunter is 170 lb i.e. ~3.7 lb/sqft, the Vulcan is 150lb i.e. ~2.2lb/sqft - a significant difference.
Being a good Lancashire lad you know '--- tha get's nowt for nowt ---!'
Cheers,
K.
Thanks for the pic's - and to the photographer, Dave Bailey. Don't know why I'm having problems uploading ---?
ORIGINAL: Robrow
Yes, interesting comparing your fuel economy with that of the big Vulcan, your average throttle % for each flight must be far higher showing a striking comparison between the two different airframe designs.
Pics attached.
Rob.