RCU Forums - View Single Post - ARF then Kit, or straight to Kit?
View Single Post
Old 07-15-2007 | 09:17 PM
  #5  
jolson88
Member
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 51
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Kirkland, WA
Default RE: ARF then Kit, or straight to Kit?

Thanks a bunch guys. That's some great advice.

I hadn't thought about the instruction and manual angle before regarding Kits vs. ARFs. Plus, like you mentioned sacgate, if I build a simple kit (and understand it), it will be easier for me to diagnose and rectify problems that arise when building an ARF (if I EVER go that route :P).

Of course, now the debate is what order. Any ideas how complex the kit for the 4 * is? Is it better to do the Sig LT-40, and _then_ move on to the 4 *? I debate because the 4 * would make a nice second plane for me. To my albeit novice eye, the 4 * doesn't look like it's all that complicated line and shape wise (especially if it's true what they say about the quality of the Sig and Great Planes kits). However, if it's not necessarily the best kit to start with, perhaps I'll have to settle for having two "trainers" in a row .

Some more questions if y'all don't mind .

- Does it matter whether I go electric or glow for the kits? I'm assuming on the good kits it basically comes down to mounting and perhaps fuel tank area?
- Are there any recommended books/websites to buy/visit regarding building kits?