RCU Forums - View Single Post - How do you test Engine DB's Properly
View Single Post
Old 10-02-2007 | 09:09 AM
  #25  
rmh's Avatar
rmh
Senior Member
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 12,630
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
From: , UT
Default RE: How do you test Engine DB's Properly

ORIGINAL: pe reivers

Since Dick started this;
Although it is a sidestep from the actual noise measurement, how to keep the noise down is equaly important
Dick already mentioned two, but there is a scope of measures that can be taken. One should bear in mind, that if any one sound source exceeds the other one by three dB, it blankets the other source. For example, if prop noise is predominant, there is no use in improving the exhaust system. Tackle that prop noise first, and then maybe there is still a need to tackle exhaust noise or something else.

Sources of noise:

1) Exhaust noise: The loudest one.
Order of power loss by muffling:
1a tuned pipe with aftermuffler(s) - no power loss even at best muffling levels (drawback: very large systems)
1b canisters (2-3-4-chamber designs) slight power loss as chambers increase (size is within reason)
1c side nufflers have serious power loss if any form of damping is present (size is small but losses are huge)

2) Prop noise.
Tip speed should stay below Mach 0.7, or the prop may start showing flow speeds approaching speed of sound. "ripping" like the crack of a whip is the result. Thinner foils with thickest foil section far back rip later and at higher tip speeds. Thin foils can be had with carbon or metal props
Lower tip speeds can be realized by keeping the pitch up. Pitches of half prop diameter or less easily enter the noise danger zone. The sound waves may set the prop in vibration, which endangers the prop and operator as well.

3) engine vibration (caused by prop unbalance, or whatever. This will set the airframe and wings in rapid oscillating motion, and the plane becomes a noise radiator. Especially the light hovering planes are bad offenders here. They just love to vibrate worse than the engine itself. To prevent this vibration, auxiliary mass dampers can be located in the tail structure and wing tips. To prevent engine and prop vibration reaching the frame, the engine can be vibration isolated by rubber mounts etc.

4) Carb noise. Some engines produce quite a lot of carb noise. Worst offenders seem the reed engines, followed by side carb port systems. Rotary valve systems are the most quiet.
Carb noise can be dampened by ducting the air inlet from the fuselage and fitting air filters or damping chambers. (plenum chamber on the carb mouth.

5) Prop buffeting. If the prop is at any point of rotation near an airframe part, that is sure to generate quite some noise, depending on the distance from the prop hub.
On the model pictured -I moved the prop as far forward as practical- copying best full scale practices
the exhaust system -all inside the fuselage -
in "cruise "mode -very quiet setup
under full power it exceeds the "test" -the 27" prop simply does not load enough to stop prop noise - this is a real problem if you are after rapid response at very low airspeeds. I have no fix for it.
Carb noise with a filter setup -not bad at all (rotary valve engine)
But as a compromise - not too bad The 40 cc pattern plane is quiet in the air as stop start flying is not part of the game.
160/150 cc models setup for really quick 3D flying -will have lots of prop noise- no way around it - the prop has to spool up fast -which means -lower loading.
For meeting stringent field noise rules - you really have to address HOW you fly the models.

My electrics solve all these issues -of course
Attached Thumbnails Click image for larger version

Name:	Ig11471.jpg
Views:	24
Size:	136.7 KB
ID:	774940   Click image for larger version

Name:	Oj27418.jpg
Views:	19
Size:	65.2 KB
ID:	774941   Click image for larger version

Name:	Wu61061.jpg
Views:	24
Size:	67.8 KB
ID:	774942