Gordon

I can take a half a dozen passages from the quoted Carl e-mail that exactly supports my conclusions just as the highlighted ones support your conclusions. The e-mail is ambigious at best and means nothing as far as a definition of AMA insurance coverage is concerned. There are two truths here regardless what Carl wrote:

1. Before there can be a denial of coverage there must be a "CLAIM!"
2. A contested "Claim" is going to be judicated by lawyers and a civil court judge!

There are thousands of possibilities that could fall anywhere between #1 & #2!! My guess is that each of those possibilities would be handled on a case by case basis and AMA is not going to go out LOOKING for cases to solve!

Having said all that I am both an AMA member and a JPO member and make an effort to abide by the rules and support both organizations with my dollars. That does not mean that I take every word one of their officers write as the GOSPEL. It also means they could be right and I am wrong! I have long felt that the AMA has never served the needs of the Jet community but rather they have taken many positions that point to them protecting the AMA FROM the Jet community. I think the JPO and it's officers have done a great job in trying to reverse that trend.

Chipperg, good luck on getting your waiver there are a lot of great people out there to help you!