OK, I get it, Hoss was jerking my chain, I'm on the same page now. In fact every one of his posts are knee jerks aimed to arise. In real life the guy is not the same on the board ... I'm with ya now.

No, I do not expect an AMA club to allow a free ride to anyone. Fair share of expenses is more then adequate. I do however expect them to abide by a "code of ethics" which more or less says to just be fair. But what I don't believe Hoss understands is that the AMA developed the program because there was tension with Park Pilots, you know it and I know it. They were also leaving flying sites because their stuff just didn't fit into the mold.

Listen Bill I suggested that the new club is formed utilizing the same board of directors as the other club, this will allow the least path of resistance and segregation. But then again I don't care and I don't think Park Pilots will either, they will get their new club with or without a local club helping them. I hold in my hands a Park Pilot sales, marketing and operations binder and DVD. I can tell you right now that the AMA did their homework and will be getting even more feedback from yours truly on how to HELP those who are intimidated or going to be shown ANY kind of resistance from a current AMA club that they still have hope and a GREAT amount of assistance from the AMA.

So in a nutshell Bill these clubs can do whatever they want, I don't really care. I live on Long Island, you live in Florida. It does not effect me. My point is that I see the potential and if a current AMA club does not make things fair, it WILL NOT be a problem for Park Pilots to find their own home and I am sure as the sun shines they will be taking current AMA club members with them. So current clubs can take the first strike and figure out a way to make it work FOR THEM or throw it in the trash. But if they think for a second they will have authority over Park Pilots in any way .... ha. Come on Bill, this is a male hobby, we are all wolves, even the 12 year olds.