Outstanding research. Here is some fill in material too: http://www.law.umkc.edu/faculty/proj.../nuremberg.htm

"No trial provides a better basis for understanding the nature and causes of evil than do the Nuremberg trials from 1945 to 1949. Those who come to the trials expecting to find sadistic monsters are generally disappointed.

What is shocking about Nuremberg is the ordinariness of the defendants: men who may be good fathers, kind to animals, even unassuming--yet committed unspeakable crimes.

Years later, reporting on the trial of Adolf Eichmann, Hannah Arendt wrote of "the banality of evil."

Like Eichmann, most Nuremberg defendants never aspired to be villains.

Rather, they either over identified with an ideological cause or suffered from a lack of imagination: they couldn't fully appreciate the human consequences of their career-motivated decisions...."