RCU Forums - View Single Post - Witch cylinder would be better between these 2?
Old 03-21-2008 | 11:20 PM
  #18  
buck1856's Avatar
buck1856
My Feedback: (49)
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 1,158
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Superior, AZ
Default RE: Witch cylinder would be better between these 2?

I remember reading somewhere that it is easier to build an engine with 7or9 cylinders than it is for 7 and smaller.Must be for the reason your stating.The more cyls in a circle would mean the degrees apart from one another would be closer or less.Plus if your making articulating rods and only 1 master rod,the master would be the hardest.The articulating rods would all be the same and would look like a normal rod.After the first one,you could use it as a pattern or like i was thinking just use weedie rods already made up.Im going to look in my WWI encyclpedia and read the descriptions on the early radial engines.I do remember they had a Rotham air pump on the wing strut with the little propeller to pressurize the fuel tank.There was also a hand pump on the right side of cockpit in case the outboard pump failed.Oops,where getting of topic,maybe we nead a thread started (scratch built multi-cylinder),we"ll see if it gets as long as the echo thread.