ORIGINAL: KidEpoxy
so, If understand your statement:
Hoss (just like the other candidate) is not a good leader
because Hoss (just like the other candidate) hasnt given us the gorey details of his plan of actions to take?
Horrace is posting here, but refuses to give any details of his plans. He did the same thing when he ran about 5 years ago. He seems to be afraid that his opponent will somehow use his plans against him. Or, he just doesn't have any real plans. We won't know unless he tells us what he is actually planning in terms beyond "I'm gonna make it better".
Mark isn't posting here at all, so we don't know what his plans are either. I hope he does join and post so the questions can be asked. If he does join, and refuses as has Horrace, then my opinion would be exactly the same.
But I think you knew that, KE.
I think Hoss answered the PPP question put to him better than the EC guys that voted against having PPP.
I think it's pretty clear where Horrace stands on PPP. One side of his mouth says he's "reserving judgement". The other side of his mouth refers to PPP guys as "Joe Parkee Flyer" and he want's them to take their toys and go play somewhere else. Sounds a bit hypocritical to me.
You're a PPP. Are you not a bit concerned about what a would be EVP thinks of your part of the hobby? You should be.
Hoss answering questions?
If you have PPP questions, why didnt you ask them of the EC members that actually took the vote on PPP.... because I'm almost certain that Hoss is not planning to travel back in time to take part in the EC vote on PPP.
I'm asking the guy who wants to be the next EVP. The guy who speaks of you PPP members in very disparaging terms. The guy who is so upset about the way the program was initiated. The guy who supposedly is "reserving judgement" but wishes you would take your toys and go play elsewhere.
Horrace answering questions? Apparently not.