ORIGINAL: Stickbuilder
Now get over it, or get on with it. You can't get my logon information from the AMA. I do my corresponding with other AMA members here on RCU. So knowing my name and AMA number won't get you anywhere. When you look at a post or a pm from me, there is no doubt from whom it came. Your argument does not hold water. As before, you can look me up in the phone book, and find my address and Zip Code. The only thing more that you can get from the AMA is my member number. Your argument is weak.
Bill, AMA 4720
Bill, AMA 4720
Conclusory arguments are non-starters. Please, tell me both where and how my logic is wrong. Simply saying that it is weak doesn't begin to address anything.
Saying that I can't get your login information from the AMA is a red-herring. I've never stated such a thing. How you do your correspondence is up to you, again, it has nothing to do with what I've said.
You say that when a person looks at a post from you, they have no doubt where it came from. That's fine, especially if they know you. Say that a fellow with the RCU name of Avistar2 signs his name with Willard Smith, AMA 459203. Say there is a Willard Smith with that AMA number. Do you know that Avistar2 is Willard Smith? Of course not. No more than I know that Stickbuilder is Bill, AMA 4720. Are you now beginning to see what is obvious, or do you require additional examples of how Horrace's method is ineffective?