RCU Forums - View Single Post - Weatronic 2.4
View Single Post
Old 05-30-2009 | 07:45 AM
  #7  
mikehannah
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 896
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Thurso, UNITED KINGDOM
Default RE: Weatronic 2.4

HI
I am surprised that they have not managed to integrate Form and Function better.( doesnt look like they even attempted it) and as rule I HATE having lose fly leads between one box and the other I would rather have them integrated into one unit as the Futaba system has. No matter how careful you are they are always going to get caught, they are always going to get damaged.I do agree it is butt ugly.

As regards features in my opinion they have set the bar and the bigger companies are doing the bare minimum as regards Spread Spectrum development. We have hardly scratched the surface yet and every development so far is being forced out of them. Fed back from the RX is NOT a big deal and to me one of the big advantages of moving to this tech but so far only Weatronic have done it.


M