RCU Forums - View Single Post - choosing a 2 stroke/4 stroke
View Single Post
Old 09-17-2009 | 10:08 AM
  #26  
DenverJayhawk's Avatar
DenverJayhawk
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 723
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Denver, CO
Default RE: choosing a 2 stroke/4 stroke


ORIGINAL: SushiSeeker


ORIGINAL: DenverJayhawk

I know lots of people say don't over power your model, but having done it, I can honestly say it's the most fun you can have legally.
I respectfully disagree. There is more to overpowering a model than just adding a bigger engine. The bigger engine throws a bigger prop and needs more ground clearance. Also you have to add a larger fuel tank as the larger engine will consume more fuel than a smaller engine generating the same thrust. I've done this, too but you are inviting catastrophic failure. My U-Can-Do 40 has an OS .65 because I read similar comments and as a result the plane is waaaaay over powered. She will accelerate in a vertical climb and outfly the large control surfaces causing significant flutter.

To the topic of this post, everyone has their favorite engine as do I and few people have bad things to say regarding OS Max. When my son steps out of his trainer, we will likely go with a Big Stick 40 with an OS .72 4-stroke which has the same HP rating as an OS .46.
I agree with the bigger prop issue but it is easily resolved by adding larger diameter wheels or longer landing gear. If the prop is properly balanced , you shouldn't have that much flutter. I also am using the stock fuel tank with the kit and I'm still able to get 15 min flights. I'd bet it could go even longer, but I generally set up landing at the 12-14 min mark.

These are small prices to pay for the added benefit of power.