RCU Forums - View Single Post - Why we don't see pattern planes for gas?
Old 10-01-2009 | 03:49 PM
  #24  
rwlewis
Senior Member
My Feedback: (4)
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 391
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Tomball, TX
Default RE: Why we don't see pattern planes for gas?


ORIGINAL: rcpattern

The Pentathalon is not a very draggy airframe to start with, and it was adequate for Advanced. I don't think it would've been a competitive setup in Masters or FAI, but was a very nice proof of concept. Had a very distinctive sound in the air as well. He did have a few deadsticks however, but the idea did work, but was certainly not a competitive setup by todays standards.

Arch
Arch, the very public deadsticks at the debut of the Gas powered OS160 on the Pentathlon were traced to a fuel tank issue, unfortunately, it happened in a very public environment and thus seems to have forever cemeted an "unreliable" label to the project...[]

The Pentathlon is draggier than you think. Just because it does have the bloated fuselage of some of it's contemporaries, does not mean it does not have a nice drag profile. The Pentathlon derives it's parasitic drag from the flying surface design. I hope to see more of the OS160 Gas model this weekend and hopefullly we can get someone to fly it through the FAI P sequence to see what kind of muscle the OS160 can really muster.

Richard