Why we don't see pattern planes for gas?
#26
Senior Member
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 1,881
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Perth, AUSTRALIA
Okay, what about if we level the playing field and talk about FAI fuel, and remove the nitromethane additive.
Or on the other hand talk about adding nitropropane to petrol?
While the 160fx is a good candidate for conversion ( the MVVS 160 had enough power to pull my 2m Haya-Ji through a knife edge loop, so I think it would have got me to masters, however the haya-ji was a slippery airframe) it still has the dubious quality (for a petrol engine) of having port sizing, and port timing suited to glow. Not to mention the fact that the con-rod really needs to be needle rollered, and in my experience on the 160, this puts a lot of stress on the needle rollers of the bing end, to fit into a conrod that will fit into the existing crankcase.
This is, to me like taking a toyota landcruiser around lemans, not particularly suitable for our needs.
I think the only way that we're going to get a competitive petrol engine, is to design a DEDICATED, petrol burning monster from the ground up with F3A soley in mind.
Or on the other hand talk about adding nitropropane to petrol?
While the 160fx is a good candidate for conversion ( the MVVS 160 had enough power to pull my 2m Haya-Ji through a knife edge loop, so I think it would have got me to masters, however the haya-ji was a slippery airframe) it still has the dubious quality (for a petrol engine) of having port sizing, and port timing suited to glow. Not to mention the fact that the con-rod really needs to be needle rollered, and in my experience on the 160, this puts a lot of stress on the needle rollers of the bing end, to fit into a conrod that will fit into the existing crankcase.
This is, to me like taking a toyota landcruiser around lemans, not particularly suitable for our needs.
I think the only way that we're going to get a competitive petrol engine, is to design a DEDICATED, petrol burning monster from the ground up with F3A soley in mind.
#27
Senior Member
My Feedback: (8)
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 1,398
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Silverdale,
WA
ORIGINAL: vbortone
Bterry,
Please read this web page for the very simple and interesting conclusion:
http://www.smokemup.com/tech/fuels.php
One number is BTU/lb and I agree gasoline has higher number. However, the IC engine can convert to power a fraction of those BTU because of the oxygen already available in the fuel. Check the chemical formulas of each fuel. Gasoline does not have any oxygen. It is practically impossible to provide all the oxygen by aspirating air into the engine and this explain why gasoline has the lowest BTU rate production (power) when used in IC engine.
Vicente ''Vince'' Bortone
Bterry,
Please read this web page for the very simple and interesting conclusion:
http://www.smokemup.com/tech/fuels.php
One number is BTU/lb and I agree gasoline has higher number. However, the IC engine can convert to power a fraction of those BTU because of the oxygen already available in the fuel. Check the chemical formulas of each fuel. Gasoline does not have any oxygen. It is practically impossible to provide all the oxygen by aspirating air into the engine and this explain why gasoline has the lowest BTU rate production (power) when used in IC engine.
Vicente ''Vince'' Bortone
Modern pump gasoline is not in fact strictly Octane (C8H18), but is actually a mixture of hydrocarbons between C4H10 and C12H26 or so, plus other additives. Ethanol (C2H5OH) is present at a 10% in most of the US.
Oxygenated fuels (added hydrocarbon molecules containing an oxygen, typically an alcohol like ethanol) are more important in automobiles where we are held to running leaner settings for emission purposes, and the oxygenated fuels raise the octane rating a bit to allow running leaner without detonating.
The vast majority of oxygen available for use in combustion is from the atmosphere, and not from the molecule itself. The oxygen molecule available on the methanol is a very slight contributor to the combustion process itself. On top of that in a gasoline engine there is significantly more (2.5 times more) available air in the combustion chamber per stroke than with a methanol engine.
All that said, much work remains to be accomplished before gasoline is truly a viable power source for pattern. Your results on the Abbra prove that!
I still believe it can happen with a larger displacement engine, but the problem is those get so HEAVY it isn't worth the effort. A Moki 2.10 would be a good candidate due to its beefy crank and conn rod but it starts out at 42 oz or so, quite a bit more than even a 1.70dz.
#28
Senior Member
ORIGINAL: AAbdu
I would love to see a 35% or 40% pattern plane. I know that it wouldn't be legal for pattern or IMAC, but how cool would it be to see like a 126 inch x 126 inch 150CC Integral! I know it will never happen and it is probably a little off topic but I think that would be great
I would love to see a 35% or 40% pattern plane. I know that it wouldn't be legal for pattern or IMAC, but how cool would it be to see like a 126 inch x 126 inch 150CC Integral! I know it will never happen and it is probably a little off topic but I think that would be great
Props are not really available for pattern type performance though. You'd have to carve you own which isn't a big deal actually. Something with around 18" of pitch should work very nicely at the lower rpm of the 150. But it would need to be crafted properly to do any good
BTW, a few months ago I watched a video of an electrified 40% IMAC plane which was using a conventional wood prop of appropriate size to drive the crate. It sounded about as noisy as the gas powered counterpart...that's how bad some large props are. That much noise requires a lot of power to generate
Another BTW, Ed Alt, Frank Imbriaco and I have been discussing the Syssa 30 cc gas engine. We will try to get to their shop in the next few weeks and bring a few pattern props with us. We will also bring the ES 40G pipe along and play a bit. We'll report in the KFactor probably. Having had considerable experience running Moki 30cc on glow, (and OS and Webra) it will be interesting to see how the engines compare.
I have a project going right now and have planned to use the ZDZ40RE F3A engine in it. If the Syssa 30 cc works well, I may reconsider the powerplant. The weight savings is substantial. The ZDZ has superb manners however....the Syssa has alot to live up to
MattK
#29

i don't wish to damage my airframe by installing a screaming gas engine in it i have see people & don't wish to do this they are very far from glow & electric power leave them for Giant scale & 3D fliers.....................i can t compare any gas engine to a glow engine.....................PEACE PLEASE.................
#30
Junior Member
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Switzerland
Another option is offered by a new Mintor 37cc gas engine: 35oz without ignition and muffler/pipe, 24lbs of thrust on a 20x8, 20x10 prop. See http://www.mintor.net/pagine/37cc.htm
#31
Senior Member
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 141
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: France, FRANCE, METROPOLITAN
ORIGINAL: g_mkoch
Hello
I always wanted to know why we dont see any large pattern planes the fly with gasoline engines. I know that a 50cc would be to big to comply with rules but it would certanly make a great plane for practice and people that do not compete. A 30cc should come under 2m and 5kg and would keep operating costs low. I know the ys 170 is a great engine but it is expensive and at $25-30 for a gallon of fuel the operating costs increase dramatically compare to gasoline.
Happy Landings
Hello
I always wanted to know why we dont see any large pattern planes the fly with gasoline engines. I know that a 50cc would be to big to comply with rules but it would certanly make a great plane for practice and people that do not compete. A 30cc should come under 2m and 5kg and would keep operating costs low. I know the ys 170 is a great engine but it is expensive and at $25-30 for a gallon of fuel the operating costs increase dramatically compare to gasoline.
Happy Landings



#32
I see that they replaced their own design carburator with a Wabro carburator. That is a good move. I tried the Mintor 110 cc for IMAC 3 years ago and didn't work at all. I recomended to use the Wabro and looks like they decided to do it. Someone needs to try this motor in pattern.
Vicente "Vince" Bortone
Vicente "Vince" Bortone
#33
Junior Member
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Switzerland
Yes, apparently they replaced their own design carburetors with Walbros on the entire line of engines. There is a link to videos made by Mintor users: http://www.mintor.net/pagine/video-cl.html#topgallery. From the videos one can get some idea as to size, vibration, power, and smoothness through the whole rpm range. However, there is no pattern plane video yet.
#34
Senior Member
ORIGINAL: highfly3D
i don't wish to damage my airframe by installing a screaming gas engine in it i have see people & don't wish to do this they are very far from glow & electric power leave them for Giant scale & 3D fliers.....................i can t compare any gas engine to a glow engine.....................PEACE PLEASE.................
i don't wish to damage my airframe by installing a screaming gas engine in it i have see people & don't wish to do this they are very far from glow & electric power leave them for Giant scale & 3D fliers.....................i can t compare any gas engine to a glow engine.....................PEACE PLEASE.................
On the other hand, it requires that you know how to build models, not just assembling and packing equipment into ARFies. If you know building, then it is simple enough to do.
BTW, the same mount design has been in my Temptress 2x2 since 2003, or at least 1500 flights. Every servo is original and has never been re-built.....the doubled rubber simply works great
MattK
#35
Senior Member
ORIGINAL: petibonum
Another option is offered by a new Mintor 37cc gas engine: 35oz without ignition and muffler/pipe, 24lbs of thrust on a 20x8, 20x10 prop. See http://www.mintor.net/pagine/37cc.htm
Another option is offered by a new Mintor 37cc gas engine: 35oz without ignition and muffler/pipe, 24lbs of thrust on a 20x8, 20x10 prop. See http://www.mintor.net/pagine/37cc.htm
MattK
#36
Gas engines can be used for pattern, but they are not going to be competitive, that's the problem, there is no way gas can compete against top glow or top electric engines/motors in AMA Masters or FAI.
To be competitive cost money, at least for know.
To be competitive cost money, at least for know.
#37
Senior Member
ORIGINAL: apereira
Gas engines can be used for pattern, but they are not going to be competitive, that's the problem, there is no way gas can compete against top glow or top electric engines/motors in AMA Masters or FAI.
To be competitive cost money, at least for know.
Gas engines can be used for pattern, but they are not going to be competitive, that's the problem, there is no way gas can compete against top glow or top electric engines/motors in AMA Masters or FAI.
To be competitive cost money, at least for know.
For me, it's the trying to design in enough lightness and simplicity so that average builders can do the same thing. I have threads on both the soft mount and the wing techniques I used. I may start one on the prop mods I am making. Wood composite props are not only much lighter than the plastic stuff, they are far stiffer.
MattK
#38

Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 668
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: NETHERLANDS
Planning on the ZDZ40RE F3A w/ tuned exhaust.
With proper cooling the Saito works.



#39
BTW, the same mount design has been in my Temptress 2x2 since 2003, or at least 1500 flights. Every servo is original and has never been re-built.....the doubled rubber simply works great
Six years are 2190days and you got 1500 flights?? I envy you....................
What class do you fly?
Six years are 2190days and you got 1500 flights?? I envy you....................
What class do you fly?
#40
Junior Member
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Switzerland
The Mintor 37cc has been available for almost two years now. In fact the majority of videos on the www.mintor.net concern this engine. The distributor of Mintor gas engines in the US is Dietrich Performance at www.dietrichaircraft.com. However, the smallest Mintor he lists is the Mintor 55cc for $595. It's worth sending him an email.
#41
ORIGINAL: Planning on the ZDZ40RE F3A w/ tuned exhaust. I guess I have to show you the way.
MattK
MattK
#42
Senior Member
ORIGINAL: apereira
BTW, the same mount design has been in my Temptress 2x2 since 2003, or at least 1500 flights. Every servo is original and has never been re-built.....the doubled rubber simply works great
Six years are 2190days and you got 1500 flights?? I envy you....................
What class do you fly?
BTW, the same mount design has been in my Temptress 2x2 since 2003, or at least 1500 flights. Every servo is original and has never been re-built.....the doubled rubber simply works great
Six years are 2190days and you got 1500 flights?? I envy you....................
What class do you fly?
MattK



